User talk:Voldemore

Welcome!

Hello, Voldemore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 21:25, Dec 12, 2004 (UTC)

protocadherins

The notion that vampires could overcome a PCDH-Y deficiency by consuming it in their food is preposterous. Eaten PCDH-Y would be broken down in the stomach and intestines just as any other protein is. Even if vampires were to give themselves blood transfusions with PCDH-Y in solution there is no way that these molecules could get into the cells of the body where they are needed. Would be nice if you could come up with something more plausible.

Username

You have a very odd username... why did you pick it?--Ch ili 14 22:21, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Green

Please see WP:FUC. We are not permitted to use copyrighted images solely to depict a living person, as you did to Eva Green. Thanks. --Yamla 23:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

trekbbs

Thank you for your opinions in the TrekBBS AFD. I do not agree with the closing admin's decision and have listed this now under Deletion Review. As you had participated in the AFD, I wished to inform you this in case you wished to voice your opinion on this --Brian_{(view my history)}/^{(How am I doing?)} 17:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Montague-seal.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 13:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the same image: {{Logo}} is not the correct tag, so I have removed it. That tag only works for official symbols, which is not the case here. If you believe it qualifies for fair use, you can add a fair use tag and rationale, but otherwise this image will have to be deleted. Valentinian ^{T / C} 23:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bond

I could not see any rhyme nor reason for James Bond (Reboot). I have moved it to User:Voldemort/sandbox. Please discuss the matter and obtain agreement before you copy it back to anywhere in the (Main) namespace. -- RHaworth 00:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See?

If you spend less time being a dick and more time adding material that is actually sourced then everybody's a winner! Otto4711 17:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unbreakable Comic book references

You need to state what Wikipedia policies would make comparing Unbreakable to comic book themes a valid addition to the article. I see absolutely NO encyclopedic value to it because it has ZERO references. That means that who ever came up with this stuff is citing there OWN knowledge of comic books and drawing comparisons to the film. That makes it original research and therefore invalid as a Wikipedia addition. My opinion on the subject is on the Unbreakable talk page. You need to site a valid reason there before you re-add this stuff. 69.72.2.72 20:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Continual editing (and reverting edits) without stating any valid reason for you edits is going to identify you as a vandal or a troll and you will be dealt with according to Wikipedia policy. 69.72.2.72 12:56, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Challenger dedication.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Challenger dedication.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Shizhao 12:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Hollowman-pic.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hollowman-pic.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. GentlemanGhost 18:19, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Project Quicksilver

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Project Quicksilver, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jnanabase.org/index.php/Project_Quicksilver. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 10:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not recreate this article. It was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Quicksilver. Reposting it is disruptive to the project. If you want to challenge the deletion process, take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review. If you repost it again, you will be blocked. -- But|seriously|folks 14:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Montague-seal.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Montague-seal.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Capulet-seal.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Capulet-seal.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Montague family and Capulet family

Just so you know, I've reversed some edits you recently made to Montague family and Capulet family. If you'd like to discuss the best way to deal with these articles, there's a short discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Shakespeare#Minor_characters_in_Romeo_and_Juliet, and we could pick it up, there. AndyJones 12:20, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WTF?

A template you created, Template:WTF?, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Cheers, Black Falcon ^(Talk) 20:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I was not vandalising. You are in violation of copyright. --125.238.25.9 15:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tinmanmovie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tinmanmovie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Caprica.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Caprica.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek Spoiler

Hey, I just thought I'd inform you about the spoiler, so, for the Star Trek movie page, you might want to read this. Just thought I'd inform you. J p G r B 02:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tinmanmovie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tinmanmovie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hendley Associates

Hendley Associates, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Hendley Associates satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hendley Associates and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Hendley Associates during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Hammer1980·^talk 22:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Company

Hi. Was the synopsis you added to The Company (TV miniseries) actually for the book (The Company (novel))? Because it seems to differ from the mini-series, especially in the ending. 172.159.38.119 (talk) 04:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Colt (Supernatural)

Hello - I just thought you might like to know that there is an AfD discussion in progress concerning the article The Colt (Supernatural). This is just a friendly notice, because you were one of the early contributors to the page. - Banazir (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Project Quicksilver

A tag has been placed on Project Quicksilver, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 21:04, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PromoShot.jpg

Hello Voldemort, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:PromoShot.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Voldemort/sandbox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tenctonese-family.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tenctonese-family.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tom McClintock

Hello Voldemore. Thank you for cleaning up the McClintock article by removing the recent news from the article opening. I think that it should be included though. I have added a section titled Controversy further down in the article. If you have ideas on how to make the section better, please feel free to change it or discuss it with me in the article talk page. Thank you. JBFrenchhorn (talk) 23:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've been mentioned on the admin noticeboard

You may wish to see and/or comment on the administrators' noticeboard, where 92.0.72.79 (talk · contribs) mentions you in a thread. This link will go directly to the thread, until it is archived. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Voldemore. I'm just leaving you a note to let you know that the AN thread has been marked resolved. Your user subpage has been deleted. As noted in that thread, we cannot include material copied from other sources unless they are released under a license compatible with GFDL or we have express permission of the copyright holder. Lacking that express permission from scifi.com, we can't include this material here. While we also can't link to external sites that we know to be in violation of copyright, you can add a link to the archived version of that page from the relevant article.

Please don't paste material here taken from other places without ensuring that it complies. For legal reasons, we cannot host text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material in article or user space; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:32, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Voldemore

User:Voldemore, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Voldemore and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Voldemore during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ironho lds 23:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment on the deletion discussion, with links to a list of wikis where you could place your pages --Enric Naval (talk) 03:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Voldemore for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Cenarium ^Talk 15:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -- lucasbfr ^talk 12:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Twila Tanner

An article that you have been involved in editing, Twila Tanner, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twila Tanner (2nd nomination). Thank you. Eastmain (talk) 01:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hendley Associates

I have nominated Hendley Associates, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hendley Associates (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Nolookingca (talk) 23:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Tinmanmovie.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Tinmanmovie.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Tenctonese-profile.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tenctonese-profile.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:39, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hollowman-pic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hollowman-pic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:49, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]