User talk:Whitebox

Welcome! Hello, Whitebox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
—wwoods 09:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the welcome Wwoods -Whitebox 18:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Real Canadian Superstore on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ~ PH DrillSergeant...§ 04:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry...My bad! ~ PH DrillSergeant...§ 05:15, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jellybeans

Here are some Jelly beans for you. I love jelly beans as they have sugar in them and most people love sugar. But on the other hand just receiving somthing from somone else just makes you happy and also just giving this to you makes me happy. I hope to spread the jelly beans all over Wikipedia, so here, you can have this lot. Please enjoy them. (I like the lime ones.)

Editors need a bit of a sugar high too.

An apple a day keeps -The Doctor- away. Or does it! ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Schnuck's Pic

Do you know which Schnuck's you took that picture in front of? Cross roads would be fine.

Thx Georgestr 04:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'll add that Whitebox 23:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:RapSnacks RedHotRiplets MurphyLee.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RapSnacks RedHotRiplets MurphyLee.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"RapSnacks RedHotRiplets MurphyLee.jpg" is an original photo created by me for Wikipedia. That is why it was specified as GFDL-self, as I have legitimately licensed my copyright under the GNU Free Documentation License. Whitebox 09:45, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Falafel_mix_box_397g.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Falafel_mix_box_397g.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Yonatan ^talk 13:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was an original photo created by me for Wikipedia. Whitebox (talk) 06:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crossroads College Preparatory School edits

It has been reported via an OTRS e-mail that the statements you are inserting into the above-referenced article are factually incorrect. Please refrain from reinserting that information unless you have a reliable source which can be cited to support it. Thank you. FCYTravis (talk) 23:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I located a citation that backed up the information. Whitebox (talk) 06:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:StPaul_sandwich.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:StPaul_sandwich.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jusjih (talk • contribs) 03:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That image was presented as an open source licensed image, but falsely, on a wiki where it became apparent they had lower standards. Whitebox (talk) 06:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

French fried onions

What does "french fried" mean? Is it an actual culinary term? I've only heard it used for "french fried potatoes" (french fries), so I had removed "french" from "french fried onions" on Green bean casserole. I notice you re-added "french", so I'm curious if it's actually any different from just normal fried onions. -kotra (talk) 19:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC) Yes, "french fried" is a de facto culinary term. I suggest to observe how this product is labeled in grocery stores to see a usage of the term "french fried". Whitebox (talk) 06:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see that since my original comment, fried onion and green bean casserole have been expanded to describe french frying a little more, and I also see from Googling that it is in fact a culinary term. Thanks for explaining! -kotra (talk) 07:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Slang

Back in January of this year, contributed a significant amount of text to the article iPodLinux. A large portion of this text persists in the current version of the article. User 70.73.59.208 (Talk) wants to tell you:

Please refrain from using slang phrases like "in a nutshell", it's unprofessional

~ 10nitro (talk) 18:06, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a phrase used by a prominent professional technical publisher O'Reilly_Media#In_a_Nutshell, though the article might be more universal without it. Whitebox (talk) 06:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ajvar hot Podravka.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ajvar hot Podravka.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Branston smallchunk pickle.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Branston smallchunk pickle.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a typo

Hi, I'm just going through the history of Splashtop and saw your edit which you tagged "(minor typo fix)". For your info, "Mo" is the correct usage in computer science, and means "Megaoctet". It wasn't a typo; it was just someone being slightly anal (or maybe French). Sorry if this sounds condescending, I don't mean to be -- I'm just typing quick! Thanks!--Rfsmit (talk) 21:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GooeyButterCake.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:GooeyButterCake.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 21:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:ContinentalBuildingSTL.jpg

File:ContinentalBuildingSTL.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:ContinentalBuildingSTL.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:ContinentalBuildingSTL.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:ColumnBrowseInOSX10.2.8.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:ColumnBrowseInOSX10.2.8.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Fixing" redirects

Please do not "fix" redirects like White pepper to Black pepper#White pepper -- see WP:NOTBROKEN. Jpatokal (talk) 10:37, 25 February 2010 (UTC) No brokenness was implied. It was reverted. Whitebox (talk) 14:58, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cecilspride pizza cheese.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cecilspride pizza cheese.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- fetchcomms☛ 02:58, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was an original image that I created. Whitebox (talk) 06:16, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Ovalteenies tablets Philippines.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ovalteenies tablets Philippines.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:50, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That was an original image of my copyright, of a product on the appropriate product page. Someone could have just as directly changed the image designation as moved for deletion. Whitebox (talk) 06:11, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Schnucks24hourSuperCenter.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Schnucks24hourSuperCenter.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:55, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the image history for that file, it is apparent that I didn't upload the current image. Someone supplied a more recent daytime image, but for some reason did not use a unique filename. It was hoped that the actual uploader would more correctly specify their image, upload a more valid image, or the processes of wikipedia would remove an infringing image. I am familiar with the GNU FDL and Creative Commons licensing, support them, and have no problem validly sharing my original visual documentations under those licenses where it might benefit wikipedia, in fact that is all I endeavor to do. Whitebox (talk) 01:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The original image was restored, btw. Whitebox (talk) 14:45, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your work on Missouri-related pages

		The Missouri Barnstar of Merit
		For providing invaluable knowledge to Missouri-related articles, particularly in the areas of Missouri wine and St. Louis. Thanks you for your work! Grey Wanderer (talk) 23:36, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you Grey Wanderer. Whitebox (talk) 03:36, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Yuba driedbeancurd.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yuba driedbeancurd.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 01:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That image was created and selected for its genericness, and to the best of my knowledge also happened to include no registered trademarks. It also however had an obvious off tint to the lighting, and the page has now accumulated suitable alternatives. So uncontested. Also that image has been there for years, so the main reason you'd notice that what the file page specifies is abnormal is because you changed the tag first. Whitebox (talk) 12:28, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mayonnaise Kewpie Japanese.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mayonnaise Kewpie Japanese.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:35, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As the article section it ended up on sites states it is apparently the most popular kind of mayonnaise in Japan, which surprised me to see cited, I had selected it for its somewhat unusual cross culture connections. This one could be undeleted. Whitebox (talk) 14:12, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Kippered Herring can190g Appel.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kippered Herring can190g Appel.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 22:41, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This picture is or was illustrative of what canned herring is like, however there is nothing essential about that particular company here. Most herring canned in Germany looks like that. Whitebox (talk) 13:12, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Kecap Manis ABC Indonesian Soysauce sweet.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kecap Manis ABC Indonesian Soysauce sweet.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:52, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed on the image page, in short, it is unique. Whitebox (talk) 13:13, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Louisiana brand hot sauce.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Louisiana brand hot sauce.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:20, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

unique, updated on the image page Whitebox (talk) 13:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DeltaElectronicsInc logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DeltaElectronicsInc logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:00, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited Vark, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Purity and Gold dust (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:43, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike some disambiguation pages, those pages both start with definitions that may be of some use to the rushed or casual reader. Whitebox (talk) 01:09, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Flavored syrup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Soda and Mint

Grocer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pepper

Pasta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Eggs

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flavored syrup, unfinished edit. Grocer, many or several of those peppers can be sold by a grocer depending on the country. Pasta, apparently an unfinished edit. Whitebox (talk) 19:54, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Help Survey

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Tofurky roast 1lb 10oz.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Tofurky roast 1lb 10oz.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 22:17, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these procedures were not as clear years ago when I contributed images to a much younger Wikipedia. Of course I would have added such tags that provide more information about copyrights related to what is documented to inform. The license of the original image was, as it stated, an image I created solely for Wikipedia, in order to present an example of something that exists in commerce. In this sort of case, what could be clearer, the copyrights for packaging almost always reside with the company that produces them. The copyright of a photo belongs to the photographer. Of course a photographer of commercial items, does not, and cannot become invested with some sort of universal commercial rights over the mere depiction of commercial items. Whitebox (talk) 10:38, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to Wikipedia Takes St. Louis!

Dust off your Polaroid camera and pack your best lenses. The first-ever Wikipedia Takes St. Louis photo hunt kicks off Sat, Sept. 15, around noon in downtown St. Louis. Tour the streets of the Rome of the West with other Wikipedians and even learn a little St. Louis history. This event is a fun and collaborative way to enhance St. Louis articles with visual content. Novice photographers welcome! Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 07:49, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Won't be at that, but I'm adding at least one building on Delmar that could really use a photo to the category. Good luck to you all. Whitebox (talk) 06:48, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

For your recent work on tea-related articles. Keep up the good work! ⋘HueSatLum ? ❢⋙ 02:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hand-coding

Hey all :).

I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).

You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at okeyeswikimedia.org and I'll set you up with an account :).

If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office ^connect. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:15, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Whitebox; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:55, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update. Whitebox (talk) 23:52, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Provel imos.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Provel imos.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:20, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RedHotRipletsRack.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RedHotRipletsRack.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:29, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Horlicks powder India Jamaica.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Horlicks powder India Jamaica.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:11, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HP chilli sauce.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HP chilli sauce.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:13, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Shasta TikiPunch.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shasta TikiPunch.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:PorkSkins saltadded.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:PorkSkins saltadded.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:RapSnacks RedHotRiplets MurphyLee.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:RapSnacks RedHotRiplets MurphyLee.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:42, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:RedHotRiplets1oz.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:RedHotRiplets1oz.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:43, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:PankoBreadcrumbsInABag.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PankoBreadcrumbsInABag.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:41, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:JerkSeasonings wet dry.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JerkSeasonings wet dry.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:26, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast

Hello, Whitebox. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:15, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cocktail waitress may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

]s, and other live music venues. Some may wear revealing clothing as a ploy to increase [[Tip (gratuity|tips]]. Casinos traditionally dress their cocktail waitresses in fancy outfits with very

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback Tool update

Hey Whitebox. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Vess soda 4cans.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vess soda 4cans.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mustard bavarian style.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mustard bavarian style.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:SamichlausBier.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SamichlausBier.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:22, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Fitz'sRootBeer.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fitz'sRootBeer.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:25, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Murray'sPomade.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Murray'sPomade.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:27, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Plochman'sMustard bottle.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Plochman'sMustard bottle.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Vernors GingerSoda.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vernors GingerSoda.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:29, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Ting grapefruit soda 300ml DG.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ting grapefruit soda 300ml DG.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:33, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Field Roast Celebr.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Field Roast Celebr.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:52, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Stuffed Holiday Roast AuraPro Turkey flavor.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Stuffed Holiday Roast AuraPro Turkey flavor.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Hermannhoff whitelady of starkenburg wine.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hermannhoff whitelady of starkenburg wine.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:54, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:StJamesWinery Muscatto.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:StJamesWinery Muscatto.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Vess orange whistle soda.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Vess orange whistle soda.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:56, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Logo Seasonic

Hi my question is why the logo of company sea sonic is not Replaceable? Thanks for your answer. Czech wiki-man --Lucas87 (talk) 18:49, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amighetti's Bakery

The article Amighetti's Bakery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not demonstrated. Tagged as needing better references since 2012

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 21:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SeaSonic logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SeaSonic logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NetPositiveIcon.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NetPositiveIcon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OpenTracker TwoWindows.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OpenTracker TwoWindows.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arcticsilver logotype.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arcticsilver logotype.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]