Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyun, Jae-Hyun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. While I think it's likely that he's notable, only 1 supersource has been presented in this article. One more (preferably two or more) would be helpful. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:26, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hyun, Jae-Hyun

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a Korean businessman. It was created by an editor who has made only two edits to Wikipedia, the other being a single edit to this page. The article is basically a CV (despite my tidying up today) and has been tagged for notability since December 2011 - nothing has happened since to suggest the subject is notable. External links are mainly about the company and companies he has worked for - these may well be notable - but notability doesn't rub off. Emeraude (talk) 08:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. ~~This source~~ This source, listed in the article, gives good coverage of him. I'm leaning towards "keep", but I'd like to see another solid source before I actually decide, and I couldn't find anything through Google News or Books. Do we know what his name is in Korean script? There might be good coverage in Korean. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 09:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, I got the wrong link before. Fixed it. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 19:17, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
ko Wikipedia article 현재현. Dru of Id (talk) 10:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:27, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Looks like we need articles on both her and the company. The Google translation of the Korean WP article is remarkably useless even as Google translations go, so I can't help much to improve the article. But apparently the total sales was in the billions of dollars. DGG ( talk ) 05:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.