Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings Norton Royal British Legion Youth Marching Band
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Kings Norton Royal British Legion Youth Marching Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band, and the article is super promotional. A merge or redirect to the town doesn't make sense to me D O N D E groovily Talk to me 21:35, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources. Additionally, there is no evidence that this organisation has such local significance that it should be merged to the article on the town. -- Whpq (talk) 15:42, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Bmusician 05:08, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm sorry, but the band doesn't meet our notability requirements. Their alleged success in the TYMBA National Champions has not been noticed by any independent any reliable media in the region. But I wish the young musicians all the best, many future successes, and a lot of fun with music :) Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:23, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per others, the band has no coverage in reliable sources that I can find. A merge to Kings Norton as proposed on that article's talk page, doesn't really make any sense as Donde says, because the content is not notable enough to fit within that article. Quasihuman | Talk 22:38, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.