Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maetan High School FC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Suwon Samsung Bluewings. (non-admin closure) czar · · 07:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maetan High School FC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD challenged without a specific reason, deletion rationale was "No indication this school football club meets guidelines including WP:ORG", which holds true. High school football clubs are generally not notable. C 679 06:32, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C 679 06:34, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Curios that there isn't a school article that is could be merged into. scope_creep (talk) 00:59, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Suwon Samsung Bluewings. Giant Snowman 20:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:27, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Suwon Samsung Bluewings. Does not meet the general notability guideline for stand-alone articles. I don't think there is much information in this article that is worth merging with the parent article, so I believe a redirect is sufficient. Mentoz86 (talk) 12:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.