Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mister France World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mister France World

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable pageant as far as I can see, no reliable sources in English or French that seem to cover it. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as article is already sourced to The Huffington Post and France 3 Rhône-Alpes. Sourcing could be improved by a motivated editor and that would push this !vote to a solid keep. - Dravecky (talk) 12:45, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please note that the Huffington article is not about the subject, it's about Mister World, and the Rhône-Alpes one is about Mister National (many of these are kind of spammy and unclear as to who organizes them). And even if they were, they could hardly be considered coverage of the pageant itself. Most of the individual pageants that feed Mister World do not have a standalone article, nor should they. There is zero to none coverage of this pageant in reliable sources, either in English or French. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 15:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As per the reasons and sources mentioned by Dravecky. WordSeventeen (talk) 12:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously?? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this is one where a full "Keep" per the same reasoning I gave for a "Weak keep" should be unlikely. I'd still need to see a couple of better sources before I changed my !vote to "Keep". - Dravecky (talk) 22:20, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 03:03, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete (WP:A7) needs lack of assertion of notability, not lack of evidence. A couple of articles, even if shaky, destroy that CSD. (No comment on the content of the issue.) Tigraan (talk) 10:35, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what happened there but I wasn't supposed to have put "Speedy". –Davey2010^Talk 16:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As pointed out by FreeRangeFrog, the Huffington and the Rhône-Alpes articles don't appear to discuss the subject of this article; instead, they talk about Mister World and Mister National, and are therefore noncontributory to this pageant's notability. From what I can gather, I am very skeptical that even a highly motivated editor could find adequate sourcing to support a high quality article about this subject. There is very sparse coverage online; I can't find any reliable sources either, let alone coverage that satisfies WP:ORGDEPTH. The pageant doesn't even have its own website that I can find—the "official website" link in the article points to the Mister National website, which indicates to me that "Mister France World" may not be significant outside the context of Mister National or Mister World. Mz7 (talk) 18:01, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mz7. Sources have to have significant coverage on the article in question to meet WP:GNG. - Mailer Diablo 23:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.