Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NWC (football club)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 15:05, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NWC (football club)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough notable/insignificant amateur club. Generic sources provided currently do not establish notability. Tame (talk) 12:07, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Clubs that play or have played in the Eerste Klasse or Tweede Klasse are usually kept. That said, I have not yet added notability-supporting references. Will cast my !vote afterwards. gidonb (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Gidonb, As I said, based on the generic sources (rather external links) provided currently, the topic is fo-shizz not notable. -- Tame (talk) 06:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Point of my comment (!) was that clubs that play at this level get kept at AfDs. Especially if existing 93 years. Besides, per WP:NEXIST, Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. The bold is in the source. gidonb (talk) 10:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - club has played in the KNVB Cup per this, general benchmark of club notability. Needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 11:35, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep There seems to be a number of match reports for the club on the web, Reported problems news story on low attendance. [1], As GiantSnowman said, they have played in the Cup. Seem to help out in the community. [2] I didn't see a lot, but enough to feel this is workable. Govvy (talk) 12:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/comment In the text "NWC Asten" is used. The club is from Asten however not commonly known by that name but by just "NWC". There's no other footballclub called NWC, so no reason to add Asten. Furthermore [[NVB|KNVB]] is a link to a DP where KNVB is not listed. --Sb008 (talk) 15:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NTEAM and the WP:GNG. Nomination fails WP:NEXIST and WP:BEFORE. WP:SNOW also applies. gidonb (talk) 00:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep A few sources and they've played in the Dutch Cup. Needs improving as GiantSnowman said. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 20:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GNG and Club notablity criteria.--Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 11:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.