Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Korean scandals (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:17, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

South Korean scandals

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

last AfD was hardly convincing. This is an indiscriminate list of political scandals, massacres and building collapses and news events with no criteria in how they make this list. LibStar (talk) 12:35, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Very objective, no criteria to make this list--Penom (talk) 15:34, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Indiscriminate and subjective in how it defines "scandal". How this passed the last AFD I am unsure. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 11:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into another page - Definitely it shouldn't be deleted, but it shouldn't be kept either... --J (t) 17:21, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

you need to suggest a merge location, otherwise this is good as delete. LibStar (talk) 13:27, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no theme on this page.Curb Chain (talk) 07:53, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.