Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yulchon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yulchon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating this article for deletion because I do not believe it meets the notability requirements as described in WP:ORG. Specifically, the article provides no references and I have been unable to find any significant coverage from independent sources on my own. Furthermore, the article reads as only an advertisement of the services the firm offers. Aka042 (talk) 23:33, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've despammed the article and added a couple of references. Based on the Korean Times article, it is a large firm, and this article would indicate that it has high profile employees. I suspect that as a Korean based firm, there's more to be found in non-English sources. -- Whpq (talk) 13:30, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in light of the improvements made by Whpq, which establish notability. TJRC (talk) 20:31, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.