The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Both categories have the same aim; one seems to be an abandoned rename of the other.Icarusgeek (talk) 13:59, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support The article has had the same name since 2009 and a discussion on the talk page confirmed the name. The category name should blindly follow. RevelationDirect (talk) 11:22, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete first category per WP:SMALLCAT (no need to merge, the article is in the parent categories already). Support renaming second category per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Would you be alright with renaming it first and then starting a separate delete discussion? Charles Essie (talk) 16:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why would you want to keep it (now)? Marcocapelle (talk) 12:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. We might as well just delete it. Charles Essie (talk) 14:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:keep. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there are enough articles to justify retention. Laurel Lodged (talk) 09:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepUttarakhand is a state of India. We should allow India to have things diffused by state. We would not even think of merging baseball stadia in Louisiana to a US category, which would be an equivalent. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:08, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: No scope to build a useful regional category here. – FayenaticLondon 09:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- You are effectively ignoring the Sahara, which makes North Africa a long way from the rest of the continent. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:10, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the spirit of WP:OVERLAPCAT, a North African category subdivided by nationality results in the same content and structure as an African category subdivided by nationality (for the North African nationalities at least). Marcocapelle (talk) 04:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete Grouping things because they're in a library (be it virtual, online, or Wikimedia related) isn't defining.RevelationDirect (talk) 11:25, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge. I'm not sure why this is a subcat of the main cat when the main cat has only one article in it, while the subcat has the main category subject film in it. I'd also say at the same time that we should rename the main cat to "Game of Death films", but I can make a separate request for that if needed. MSJapan (talk) 03:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge -- I have made the rule "one franchise: one category. The target has only got one article in it, clearly showing that an "other" category is not needed. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
