The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. ℯxplicit 06:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:merge, originally Book of Nehemiah wasn't a separate book anyway and the amount of articles in the category also doesn't merit a separate category. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:29, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I do not agree. There is enough content in the category. Tostarpadius (talk) 12:15, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are at least 4 books that as variorly known as Ezra or Nehemiah. See Esdras. Rather than sub-divide per the canonicity rules of various denominations, it makes more sense to bring them all together in a single space so that the inter-relationships can be seen at a glance. Laurel Lodged (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Ezra and Nehemiah have a close relationship, and are not even always considered distinct books.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. ℯxplicit 06:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:delete per WP:OCEPON, too little content for an eponymous person's category. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:23, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. ℯxplicit 06:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:merge as an unnecessary category layer with just one subcategory and no articles in it. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per clarification above Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unecessary category layer. Dimadick (talk) 11:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. ℯxplicit 06:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: It should be specified that these articles are about television series, considering Category:Teen drama films exists as well. snapsnap(talk) 17:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nom This is about television series, while we have many articles on films of the same genre. Dimadick (talk) 11:24, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. ℯxplicit 06:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The name and scope note for this category make it an anomaly compared to Category:Politicians from New York City and the existing subcats for the Bronx and Manhattan, which incorporate both politicians for those places as well as from them. While I can appreciate that a category limited to the former would be more helpful for certain users or queries, but it would be enough of a departure from how we categorize "people from" broadly, not to mention this specific category tree, that a change is desirable here. BDD (talk) 17:31, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nom Location categories foe people are always in the "from" format. Dimadick (talk) 11:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:National sports teams of the Iroquois Confederacy[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Iroquois Confederacy is anachronistic. Iroquois or Iroquois people (or Haudensaunee) is the current WP naming convention. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 03:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also, since all of the Iroquois national sports teams are lacrosse teams, this category could be sub-category of Lacrosse of the Iroquois. Not a big deal either way, but thought I'd bring it up. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 03:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've had second thoughts on this. I withdraw the name change. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 23:17, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
One article of the two articles, and also this site suggest the name of Haudenosaunee Confederacy. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:09, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Iroquois is the name given to them by the French and Haudenosaunee is their own name. I don't have a strong opinion on I vs. H, Iroquois is more well-known, but I do think they should be able to name themselves. I do think the Confederacy should stay. I was premature in filing the request to move. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 02:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lacrosse of the Iroquois Confederacy[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Iroquois Confederacy is anachronistic. Iroquois or Iroquois people (or Haudensaunee) is the WP naming convention. I started this manually, and changed about 10 articles. Sorry. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 03:00, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hold on. See discussion above. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Er, the articles of this category have been moved to the target by a bot, today. In any case it seems to make perfect sense to merge the two categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:00, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I think they should remain separate. National sports teams of the Iroquois Confederacy should be a sub cat of both National sports teams by country and Lacrosse of the Iroquois Confederacy. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 21:46, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Sorry for causing this mess. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 14:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
