Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 October 31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 31

[edit]

Category:BBC America shows

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 00:57, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I believe we call these "series", not "shows". Sandstein 19:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Government agencies of Barbados

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge and rename to Category:Government agencies of Barbados. – Fayenatic London 12:17, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate categories. Both have 3 identical mother categories (Government agencies by country, Government of Barbados, Organisations based in Barbados) and part of the content is found in both categories, such as Barbados Coast Guard. I suggest merging them into a name following the structure of Government agencies by country. Note that Category:Government ministries of Barbados are found elsewhere, so there is no need in keeping ministries in the name. Place Clichy (talk) 15:59, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:WrestleMania themes

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Timrollpickering 00:58, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining category. Songs were not written specifically for WrestleMania. --woodensuperman 15:42, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Soldier characters in video games

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 00:57, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 9#Characters in video games categories JDDJS (talk) 04:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Landlocked U.S. states

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete - jc37 01:13, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Technically correct, but seems to be an unnecessary sub-categorization of Category:States of the United States, and isn't a defining attribute. Michigan doesn't border the ocean but does border lakes, and many other inland states border major rivers. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Direct access to the ocean (and lack thereof) is a defining characteristic of a state, and although major rivers may provide access, the economy and demographics of landlocked states can be very different from ones with direct ocean access.--AirportExpert (talk) 04:36, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: per AirportExpert. JDDJS (talk) 04:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, or redefine in a way that is meaningful. Each of the Great Lakes States has ocean access via the St. Lawrence Seaway - you can pilot a boat from Chicago to any port in the world - and it contradicts common sense to categorize those states as "landlocked" in any but some hypertechnical sense. This category does not aid readers in understanding but instead, confuses them. JohnInDC (talk) 10:46, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per JohnInDC. Michigan is hardly landlocked, as noted above, and other states that might be hyertechnically considered landlocked are not in a practical sense, i.e. Pennsylvania and the Port of Philadelphia. Given the level of confusion at work here, this category as applied does not assist our readers. Imzadi 1979  13:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a report about a lawsuit challenging a Michigan law requiring oceangoing vessels to obtain a state permit before they can use Michigan ports. A "landlocked state" would have no use for such a law. I'm not sure who the "Great Lakes Seaway Partnership" is, but they note as a matter of simple passing fact, that "Steel products from Europe, South America and Asia are off-loaded from ocean-going vessels in Detroit for use by local manufacturers." JohnInDC (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Join the club! In the course of trying to make sense of this Category, I stumbled across List of landlocked U.S. states, a single (and questionably) sourced list of US States said to be "landlocked". I've repeated several observations here, at the Talk page there, in anticipation of a possible AfD. Additional comments are welcome there - JohnInDC (talk) 15:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just as a follow up note I have AfD the list article at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_landlocked_U.S._states. Just as a reminder to all there is also a mainspace article at landlocked. Randomeditor1000 (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What if we were to define "landlocked" as states that do not border an ocean or the Great Lakes? would that clarify things? I just edited the category to no longer define states that border the Great Lakes as "landlocked".--AirportExpert (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)AirportExpert[reply]
Well, "we" don't define anything. Reliable sources do. And there aren't any for this concept as far as I can see. The whole notion is sketchy at best, and I think we're better off without it at all. JohnInDC (talk) 17:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There aren't too many occasions when you get to say something "begs the question" in the classic, and correct, sense, but this is one of them. JohnInDC (talk) 21:19, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Directors

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This and all of it direct sub categories should be renamed to clarify exactly what type of director it is for, so it;s not to be confused with other types of directors. JDDJS (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Prefer Category:Directors of the performing arts - Peter Hall and Peter Brook do not do "entertainment". Johnbod (talk) 14:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. This is really the primary topic. The category page itself adequately disambiguates other uses. Also, Category:Producers is arguably just as ambiguous. If it is renamed, I think you have issues choosing between "performing arts" (is directing reality TV, or a news program, or a sporting event broadcast, a performing art?), "entertainment" (per Johnbod above), or either for that matter (is a director of television commercials directing performing arts or entertainment?). Your best bet is probably something like "Directors (arts and media occupation)", and that hardly seems better to me. --Bsherr (talk) 20:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as nominated. This is a good idea in principle. The intended scope is clearly artistic, but the unqualified word "director" includes company directors, and the ambiguity invites miscategorisation. The WP:PRIMARYTOPIC concept referred to by @Bsherr works well in article space, but not in categories, which need greater precision.
  1. I am not satisfied that the proposed title includes all the relevant types, which include both arts and entertainment and other media roles (e.g. directors of documentary films are not really either entertainers or artists). I think that @Johnbod's suggestion of "Directors of the performing arts" is the best so far, but I am not sure that it would includes Category:Video game directors or documentary film directors. "Creative directors" is tempting in principle, but that term has a specific meaning in advertising. Even so, I think it is the best fit, and the article creative director supports the broad usage.
  2. This nomination includes only the parent category of a large tree. There is no point in doing this unless the subcats are also renamed, and there are lots of them: Category:Directors by genre or type‎, Category:Directors by nationality (plus 116 subcats e.g. Category:Albanian directors), Category:LGBT directors‎, Category:Fictional directors‎, Category:Women directors‎. They should all be listed and tagged, so that editors interested in those categories are aware of this discussion.
I hope something can be agreed here, because there is a problem to be resolved. But I strongky oppose renaming the parent without renaming the subcats, or renaming the subcats unless they are listed and tagged. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:51, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.