The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This had only one entry (which was wrongly categorised) and is now empty. There were few if any films before the 1910s that could reasonably be categorised as a comedy western so I think it is best to delete this category. Any of the short western films from the 1890s or 1900s which contain elements of comedy can conveniently go to the main genre categories. No Great Shaker (talk) 14:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@No Great Shaker: That article looks well-sourced. Have you checked the sources to see whether they support the assertion that the film is a proto-Western? You removed that assertion along with the category, but your edit summary just says not a western. What sources support your assertion that it's not?--BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 15:07, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The term "proto-Western" was used in the lead only and not explained in the narrative. It is false in any case because proto- means the original, the first from which all else follows. The Western originated in the USA and there were already Western genre films before 1897. In the narrative, two of the main sources concur that the action depicts real life in Caracas at the time. The plot as such could have been staged anywhere in the world where carriages and coaches were in use – London, Paris, wherever. Apart from anything else, the film is not mentioned in any of the major sources about the history of the genre. Works by people like Charles Musser, Kim Newman, David Lusted, William Everson – to name a few. If a "proto-Western" had been filmed in Venezuela in 1897, these guys and many others would know about it and would mention it. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As stated, this category has been emptied. LizRead!Talk! 01:09, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Given the era, and the paucity of films at that time, I don't see the intersection as being either of great merit or easily populatable. Hell, there are only four movies in Category:1890s Western (genre) films overall. Grutness...wha? 04:14, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's right, and the known maximum is twelve. It was not until the mid-1900s that production increased significantly. No point in having a sub-cat even if one of the twelve is a comedy, and none of them is. No Great Shaker (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:C1. The discussion above persuades me that the category was justifiably emptied. However, it should be deleted without prejudice to its re-cration if another article genuinely belongs here. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 11:39, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:C1 as BrownHairedGirl says. Deleting categories that have been empty for seven days is standard procedure. Scorpions13256 (talk) 21:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:American people of Cambodian descent occupation[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: These WP:SMALLCATs are unlikely to significantly grow in the near future and contain only 1 or 2 articles. User:Namiba 14:28, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SMALLCAT as part of an established series. There may be a case for deleting the series, but that's a separate discussion. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 14:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell, there are less than 50 sportspeople of X descent categories and there are even fewer musician categories. Moreover, similar categories have been deleted in the recent past. See this and this for examples. How exactly is this an established series?--User:Namiba 18:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This category also clearly fails WP:EGRS. The Cambodian population in the US is relatively small and neither the musicians nor the sportspeople qualify as unique topics per EGRS.--User:Namiba 18:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone can explain how Cambodian descent affects what they do. Rathfelder (talk) 10:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
While Asian Americans in sports does not provide a definition of Asian American, article Asian Americans suggests there still is a racial use of the term, since West Asian people may be excluded. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:04, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge per Place Clinchy. We categorize by ethnicity, not race, and the continent wide categories are either by race and mix people from multiple races. Is someone born in Israel to Israeli parents and resident from age 5 in the US who is a naturalized citizen and a musician belonging in category;American musicians of Asian descent? If not, exactly on what grounds do you exclude them?John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:46, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Withdrawn by nominator. Just recategorising the 5 pages probably makes more sense. (non-admin closure) — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 13:13, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People educated at St Peter's Catholic School[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. – FayenaticLondon 16:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:merge, for Early Netherlandish painters it is trivial whether or not they came from the county of Flanders. A nice illustration is Simon Marmion who is in this category while he was actually French. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, there is no need for two categories.Mistico Dois (talk) 15:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: To resolve an ambiguity. The category name can be interpreted as meaning the category is about the history of "Buddhism texts", when in reality it is about texts on the "history of Buddhism". The incorrect interpretation was suggested by the application of the parent category Category:Buddhist texts, which I have now removed. (The category was mistakenly speedily renamed to Category:History of Buddhist texts, but this has been reverted. See discussion on this issue here.) Good Ol’factory(talk) 03:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. – FayenaticLondon 15:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom but I think the category can be deleted rather than merged because (nearly) every article is also in another subcategory of Category:Indian philosophers. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. We would only use Category:Male philosophers if philosophy were somehow segregated. The category for women should be kept because being a woman philosopher is much more defining. Scorpions13256 (talk) 21:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:League of American Wheelmen members[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. – FayenaticLondon 15:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, just membership of an organization is hardly ever defining. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Broadcast Music, Inc. composers and writers[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. – FayenaticLondon 15:50, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Broadcast Music, Inc. is an American organization that collects license fees on behalf of composers and writers who register with them and these articles generally mention registering with BMI in passing. I certainly can't argue WP:SMALLCAT here since, according to that main article, BMI represents 1.1 million artists and it is so ubiquitous there was a Supreme Court case over whether it was an illegal monopoly. BMI maintains a large searchable database right here which seems like a better platform than Wikipedia for this much data. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
