Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 January 27

< January 26	January 28 >

January 27

Category:Cats in comics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 09:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Cats in comics to Category:Comics about cats

Nominator's rationale: The two seem largely identical in scope, and the second is currently a subcategory of the first. Qualiesin (talk) 23:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "Cats in comics" is the broader name. I would say that it could house cat characters from comics -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 06:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. --Just N. (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Historically black Roman Catholic universities and colleges

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 10:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Historically black Roman Catholic universities and colleges (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Per WP:Smallcat. It is the only Catholic HBCU. As far as I know, Catholic institutions are colour blind. Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: There are others, including Claver College in Guthrie, Oklahoma, which I'm working on a page for. natemup (talk) 20:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as long as it remains limited to a few articles they can directly link to each other in the body text or in a "See also" section, then you do not need a category. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:44, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- The parent category, HBUC, is an enormous one. Is the one currently in the category really the only example? Peterkingiron (talk) 18:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to the article - yes. The others must be Protestant. Laurel Lodged (talk) 21:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and SMALLCAT case rule. Or hurry up to populate it. --Just N. (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Prehistoric Park

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 09:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Prehistoric Park (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Contains only the parent article about a 15 year old TV series. Fuddle (talk) 05:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Just N. (talk) 20:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:C2F. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 09:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Free biomedical software

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. – Fayenatic London 10:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Free biomedical software to Category:Free bioinformatics software

Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom and SMALLCAT case rule. --Just N. (talk) 20:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.