Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 14

[edit]

Category:Anti-immigration activism in Germany

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To match the larger categories e.g. Category:Anti-immigration politics by country and Category:Anti-immigration politics in Europe. User:Namiba 18:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mexicali Aquilas players

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 13:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This team was known as the 'Aguilas,' which translates to 'Eagles.' I'm not sure where "Aquilas" is coming from. There's already a Category:Águilas de Mexicali players for players with the same-named team that was formed in 1970 so I don't know if it should be merged or what. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 03:56, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dams in Hokkaido

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Category:Dams in Hokkaido

Category:Categories by century and country

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy keep Ah, thank you for the explanation, now I got it. Privybst (talk) 15:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Confusing names of the categories. Why not to merge? Privybst (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People of United Empire Loyalist descent

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Category:People of United Empire Loyalist descent

Category:Set indices

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:54, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: More easily understood, and following the name of the explanatory page WP:Set index articles. Editors may consider that this can be speedily closed under WP:C2D. Note: see also Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 10#Set indices on tropical cyclones which should be closed in line with this one. – Fayenatic London 13:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse.swpbT • go beyond • bad idea 00:39, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse. Pichpich (talk) 18:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Fayenatic london, for the merge (Category:Set indices on fungi to Category:Set index articles on organisms) the target doesn't exist. — Qwerfjkltalk 14:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Qwerfjkl: see above – it is currently named Category:Set indices on organisms. – Fayenatic London 14:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Inorganic molecular formula set index pages

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT, only three pages. Otherwise, rename as above. – Fayenatic London 13:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Fayenatic london, appears to be a split? — Qwerfjkltalk 14:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Qwerfjkl: see above – the redlink target is currently named Category:Molecular formula set index pages. – Fayenatic London 14:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Death care industry

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Category:Death care industry

Category:Death care companies

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The current name has drawn negative reactions from outside the United States at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 10#Category:Funeral directors of Austria, to the point that participants are reluctant to upmerge single-member subcats to this category purely because of its name. "Funeral-related companies" was chosen for the UK sub-cat at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 2#Category:Funeral directors of the United Kingdom. – Fayenatic London 12:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1982 in basque peola

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 13:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Misspelling. Replaced by Category:1982 in basque pelota Colonies Chris (talk) 10:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional avatars

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. – Fayenatic London 13:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Members of this category are mostly WP:OR and are pretty unlikely to have been actually classified as avatars, save for a few select characters like Aang. I suggest it should be merged into deities, while removing the characters who are not explicitly deities in their fictional works. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 07:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.