Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 3

< September 2	September 4 >

September 3

Category:People by raion in Ukraine

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 12:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:People by raion in Ukraine to Category:People by second-level administrative country subdivision

Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant layer with only one subcategory. Except in Crimea, Ukrainian people are diffused by first-level administrative divisions (oblasts). Marcocapelle (talk) 16:37, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:48, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. --Privybst (talk) 15:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Songs in memory of

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 12:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Songs in memory of Michael Jackson to Category:Songs about Michael Jackson
Propose merging Category:Songs in memory of Martin Luther King Jr. to Category:Songs about Martin Luther King Jr.
Propose merging Category:Songs in memory of John Lennon to Category:Songs about John Lennon

Nominator's rationale: merge per precedent in this earlier discussion and this earlier discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 16:11, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Good housekeeping. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Years in Tunisia

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 11#Years in Tunisia

"Bus accidents" to "Bus incidents"

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 12:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Bus accidents to Category:Bus incidents
Propose renaming Category:Bus accidents by continent to Category:Bus incidents by continent
Propose renaming Category:Bus accidents in South Africa to Category:Bus incidents in South Africa
Propose renaming Category:Bus accidents in the Philippines to Category:Bus incidents in the Philippines
Propose renaming Category:Bus accidents in Albania to Category:Bus incidents in Albania
Propose renaming Category:Bus accidents in Bulgaria to Category:Bus incidents in Bulgaria
Propose renaming Category:Bus accidents in Italy to Category:Bus incidents in Italy
Propose renaming Category:Bus accidents in Montenegro to Category:Bus incidents in Montenegro
Propose renaming Category:Bus accidents in Norway to Category:Bus incidents in Norway
Propose renaming Category:Bus accidents in Romania to Category:Bus incidents in Romania
Propose renaming Category:Bus crashes in the United States to Category:Bus incidents in the United States

Nominator's rationale: There was a discussion on 6 March 2016 to rename many traffic accident categories to use the "incidents" label, but as can be seen there remain many that use the "accident" label. Possibly C2C-able but would rather make sure it gets consensus since category root uses 'accidents' terminology. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 13:38, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support incident is better than accident, what with non-accidents and crimes -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Alumni of the University of Malta

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 11#Category:Alumni of the University of Malta

Category:Province of Brandenburg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: purge. I'll also list category pages on the talk page per Marcocapelle. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 12:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose purging Category:Province of Brandenburg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: purge populated places, this is a history category about a former province, it should not contain current places. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:47, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 14:56, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Listify and purge Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:16, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Listify?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 10:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not too sure about list requirements in general, but I doubt this would even qualify for a list. Suggestion: list all current category members on the talk page of this discussion page and leave it to anyone to boldly create a list article with the risk that it gets AfD'd right away. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Moorish

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 11#Moorish

Category:Mauritanian Moors

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 11#Category:Mauritanian Moors

Category:Preteen pregnancy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Precocious puberty and pregnancy. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 20:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Preteen pregnancy to Category:Teenage pregnancy

Nominator's rationale: Discussion at Talk:Teenage pregnancy supports having information about preteen pregnancies on the page even though it is titled after teenagers. WashyGenius (talk) 06:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Category:Precocious puberty and pregnancy as clearly within the scope of that category, even though pregnancy is not mentioned in its main article Precocious puberty. Two out of four member articles are also in that one already. – Fayenatic London 20:57, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: @Fayenatic london: I do not agree with this. Puberty in preteens (10-12) is not considered precocious puberty, but normally occurring puberty. Now for the pregnancy being precocious, yes it is, but it's not the same as a girl with precocious puberty (e.g. a 6-year-old) getting pregnant. WashyGenius (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Category:Precocious puberty and pregnancy. The list article set a limit of the mother being under 11 at the time of the birth or abortion, which feels about right. Most of the cases in the list do not have separate articles. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians in the AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 20:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Wikipedians in the AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD to Category:Wikipedians in the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

Nominator's rationale: It's more faithful to the ridiculousness of meta:Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists page. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:13, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the point of the bizarre acronym is so that people will want to find out what it stands for, so I would lean towards not renaming, but have no firm opinion here. Aza24 (talk) 03:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not rename, it would be a way too long name. I would not oppose deletion though. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as joke/nonsense user category. If kept I prefer the longer name, as it's very unusual for a category name to be less detailed than the page it is named after. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:48, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- A pointless user category. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:53, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does nothing to promote user collaboration. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It does no harm! Oppose rename. It's used on 489 User pages. I also suspect if it is deleted, it'll just keep being recreated as a red link category that the page will end up being protected. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So we should stop trying to enforce the rules because some people are willing to go out of their way to subvert them? That makes absolutely zero sense. Not to mention the category is largely template-populated anyway so the number of users in the category is a red herring. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If it is recreated it can be WP:G4'd, same as with every other category that is deleted at WP:CFD. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.