Star Parker – I am speedily closing this request because it does not say why the deletion was wrong or why the deletion discussion was wrongly closed.
To everybody who's coming here from an external site: Wikipedia has content-neutral inclusion requirements documented at WP:BIO. The discussion found that these requirements were not met, so the article was moved to a holding area for further improvement. You are welcome to help improve it there, taking into account our fundamental rules. After the deficiencies have been addressed, the article's restoration can be requested again in this forum. – Sandstein 08:54, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Someone deleted Star Parker's page? This seriously passed review?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.12.64 (talk)
There seem to be sources for this activist. The AfD didn't seem to think they were enough, but possibly the participatnts were swayed by the neglibile content of the article. As mentioned by the last !voter, WP:Userfiction is probably the way to go here. There seem to be secondary sources that discuss the subject, but the challenge may be in finding independant such sources. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there is an incubator article here. This review (and a string of indignant comments elsewhere) seems to have been triggered by the latest G4 deletion rather than the AFD in particular. --82.19.4.7 (talk) 23:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
