Roundtable Institute – Moot. Unfortunately, this review didn't see any real participation, so this closure is going to largely represent my own personal opinion. My take on this is that the AfD was over four years ago. After that span of time, if somebody wants to go ahead and write a new article on the same topic, there's no need for a formal review, just go ahead and create it. That being said, I'm not convinced the new references presented really change anything. Most of them are in Chinese, which I don't read, so I had to rely on auto-translate tools. Of what I could read, however, I didn't come away with the impression that these met the bar of establishing notability per WP:N. One of them was from Facebook, which is clearly not a reliable source. In short, I'm going to re-delete this, but anybody is free to create a new article under this title if they wish. If anybody else objects, they can take it to AfD, where it will hopefully get a better review than this. – -- RoySmith(talk) 13:24, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
With the following secondary sources, I think the notability of the institude should be reassessed. [1](Apple_Daily)[2][3](from the website of the government of zhejiang province)[4](taken from [5]Apple_Daily)[6](from Mingpao) The closing admin doesn't object to a deletion review, per the reply on my talk page.180.155.72.174 (talk) 14:23, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Request Hi, can the page be temporarily restored, please, so that non-admins can take a view? The Whispering Wind (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
