Jennifer Parlevliet – Deletion endorsed. Regarding restoring to draft, while proposed and normally accepted, Cryptic's comment at 18:28 29/12 precludes me from doing so due to usefulness. Will contact the applicant directly regarding draftification given Cryptic's comment at 18:28 29/12. [close amended 23:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)] It sounds like a total rewrite from scratch would be preferred, if any editor is so inclined. Daniel (talk) 21:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Olympian who is also in the Equestrian Victoria Hall of Fame. I don't think sufficient research past a basic google search was done. Australian newspaper coverage online is very poor from the 1990s due to highly concentrated media ownership and tightly held copyright. Should be draftified as a minimum, or redirected to the olympic event she competed in. The-Pope (talk) 16:05, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Asking the closing admin for a draft is going to be the best result I feel, I did my own WP:BEFORE search and could not find any significant coverage of her that wasn't the Equestrian Victoria Hall of Fame, but if you can find sources draft space will be the best option. SportingFlyerT·C16:58, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Restore to draft based on The-Pope’s good faith request to recreate this page with SIGCOV that may or may not exist. Best case, coverage is incorporated and the draft is accepted at AFC. Worst case, minimal or no SIGCOV is found and the draft will be abandoned and eventually G13ed, which is not a big deal at all. FrankAnchor18:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse the close, and advise the appellant that they may fix it by creating a redirect, creating a draft, or submitting a draft for review. The title was not salted, and permission from DRV is not required to create and submit a draft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert McClenon (talk • contribs)
I'm not an admin, so I can't see what was in the deleted article. I'd like to work from that, with the full edit history, not start from scratch. The-Pope (talk) 13:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're going to be disappointed. It cited basically nothing, was four sentences long, and managed to fit at least two inaccuracies into them. —Cryptic18:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:DRVPURPOSE point 3: "if significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page" No one mentioned that she's in a hall of fame during the AfD. The nominator also incorrectly claimed that she "didn't even compete in the individual Olympic event", when she did. It was a minimal AfD at best, IMO. The-Pope (talk) 13:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
