Wikipedia:Editor review/Avenue X at Cicero

Avenue X at Cicero (talk · contribs · count) I have been editing here for around 3 months and would like to know about my loopholes from other editors so that I can serve Wiki better. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 12:35, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
My primary contributions have been mainly creating articles relating to West Bengal, a template of the results of WB2011, politics related articles, reverting vandalism, patroling new articles, and tagging articles.
Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
I have been in content disputes mainly with newly auto-confirmed users, where I revert their unsourced info. Most of the time, disputes are resolved but when not, I request for an admin to interfere and amicably mediate.

Reviews

You now have a piece of featured content that is within the area that you work :) --Guerillero | My Talk 22:03, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]