Wikipedia:Editor review/HighInBC
HighInBC (talk · contribs) I am in the proccess of a RfA and have been warned that I am not yet experienced enough and believe this. It was also recommended to me to make an Editor Review request, I am doing so now. Please let me know where I can improve myself, and what I have done well.
Reviews
Comments
- See this user's edit history with Interiot's tool and edit summary usage (Warning:Both tools have stopped updating and the edit counts are way off. Please consider using Flcelloguy's Tool or Interiot's Tool 2)
Questions
- Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- Answer I am particularly proud of my contributions to Ethics of eating meat - Before, After. When I found it, there were very few editors and it was extremely POV. This was a challenge as I have a definite POV on this subject. I started with a new layout, then went through and removed POV statements. Attempts were made to work with the existing editors but there were none. After my cleanup and a RfC for the article I am happy to say that it has several editors working on it. I have also made several contributions to technical subjects[1][2][3]. HighInBC 20:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Answer I have never been involved with an edit war. I have however made edits that are controversial[4] though only after talking on the discussion page [5]. I do not repeat an edit once it has been disputed without further talk. Just recently I was caused stress by this comment[6] on a talk page and I responded like so: [7] then [8]. In retrospect I feel I could have handled this better [9] by explaining my argument in more detail. HighInBC 20:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)