Wikipedia:Editor review/Iamawesome800

Iamawesome800

Iamawesome800 (talk · contribs) The reason I want to be reviewed is because, I basically just want to see what my peers think of my editing and how I could make them better, cause that's what I want to do, improve. Iamawesome800 22:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Reviews

• Right then, you have a good edit count and recently, your edit summaries have been good. Good article edits altough more expansions may be good. Your main area of fixing is no less important though. I like the way you deal with conflicts, gathering your sources and all. There is a good balance of article, talk and other edits, which is great. I also see that you edit in an area, NFL, which is really good. I also likeI can't really critize you much at all especially for such a new editor, the only thing I think you could do is see if you could do a few more expansions but overall, you are doing great. Overall rating:9.5 out 10

PS: And you are pretty awesome.:) Andy (talk) 17:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

• I see you in lots of places. I see you in every WP:RFA and always out there. You have been in Wikipedia shorter than me, and you have like 5 times the edits! I think you are doing a good job! Overall Rate: 8.75 of 10. You do have a very high amount of edits! Question? Click ROCKS! on my sig. K50 Dude ROCKS! 04:54, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

• Agreed with above. You are everywhere, and as far as I can see and your name suggests, you ARE awesome, and you are doing a great job in everywhere you participate. Very kind user, as well. My rating? Overall rating: OVER 9,000!!!!! out of 10. Keep it up! Inferno, Lord of Penguins 22:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments

• View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   My best contributions according to me are to NFL related articles mostly the NFL free agency market.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   Of course I've come into conflict in the past. For example, whether or not a player was signed and I think he was based on a source I found and the other editor says no that he wasn't. So then I will just recheck my source, look for other sources to find the answer and bring it to the other editor.