Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Editor review/Just H 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Just H (talk · contribs) I'd like to see if i'm ready for adminship, I have 5 months under and over 3,000 edits under my belt, all distributed all over the place. Just H 01:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

  • Hi Just H! Great work on NBA-related template and contents. I am a basketball fan myself :P Stub sorting is also a tough task to handle. Again, good work!

However, I don't think your ready for adminship yet. Here are some reasons for it:

  • Talk pages: Only 8 Article talk per 1060 mainspace edits. This is really low. Your user talk number is impressive, but most of them are welcome messages as you mentioned. Welcoming new users is GREAT, but if that's 1/3 of your total edits, it's kind of disproportional. 5 Wikipedia talks is a problem also. People will immediately use that to oppose your RFA (You probably seen it?)
Suggestion: You can participate more in discussions of sports-related article and WikiProjects to increase you talk count in both of these talk space.
  • Activity: 90% of your total edits is in this month. This will give people impression that you've really only been active this month (although untrue, but that's the impression).
  • 1 FA Standard: Your edits are spread all over the place, and there's no particular article that you contributed immensely in. Try to dedicate yourself in writing couple articles, or try to bring a article to FA status.
  • You haven't posted in WP:VP also. Users will use that as something to oppose.

You have many participation in AfD, which is good! (Although they aren't very impressive in content. Maybe your not those people that likes to present detailed arguments :P).

In overall, if you could improve these areas mentioned above, you should be good. I love how you constantly assume good faith, which is really hard sometimes. Best wishes! AQu01rius (User • Talk) 04:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Another thing that I noticed was your lack of image edits (meep!) Consider doing a little bit of work with image tagging, at least enough that it's clear you understand the different basic tags. I like that you've done some edits on controversial and current articles. I think that as aforemention, more talk would be great. The comments I've seen have been civil, which is good. Definitely consider expanding your horizons and work! Oh, and you missed a few edit summaries, which (I think) are extremely important. Hope this helps. Happy editing! Verloren Hoop 22:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    Several templates for the NBA Draft and over 1,000 welcomes. Just H 01:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I assumed good faith with User:$295,040.16!? I CANT BELIEVE IT!!, and tried to clarify things with a few other editors so he wouldn't have an excuse to come back as a vandal if he was in deed a user acting in good faith. Just H 01:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]