Wikipedia:Editor review/Just H 3
Just H (talk · contribs) Looking to improve further is all. Just H 21:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
- OK, so, this be my first review, so I hope it's good :). Looking at your last 1000 edits, you are definitely one of the most amazingly committed welcomers I've ever seen. That's good. You have a good mainspace count, keep it up, but what I'd like to see more of is recent changes/newpage patrolling and AFD participation. I noticed you ran for an RFA recently; take the criticism there to heart as well.
Keep working hard, and fight vandalism, and I'm sure you can have a successful RFA in a few months.
Yeah, my review is short, but it's what I glean immediately. Hope it helps! DoomsDay349 03:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- 2006 New England Patriots Season, which I have about 250 edits on now(i'm guessing it'll take maybe 2000 at this rate to get it up to FA status) and welcoming over 1,000 people. Just H 21:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ProtectionBot and User talk:David Levy in response to it. I'd like some feedback on how I handled it. I am a critic of alot of Wikipedia's systems and I would like to try to reform them(the skeptic userbox on my userpage was the closest one I could find to express this). Just H 21:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Don't fret about that. It's common for oppose voters to be bullied by enthusiasts. It's very rude of them but it goes unremarked. You have every right to oppose the adminning of the bot for any reason you choose. I oppose it myself. The guy can write a sekrit script to message him with the names of templates that need protecting and do it by hand but I'll never support adminning an unsupervised bot, for much the same reason you gave. Grace Note 07:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- But the main problem is that Just H was very agressive to some the support votes in the bot RFA and that something that would give many oppose votes if an rfa is developing soon Jaranda wat's sup 20:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Doesn't that seem like a double standard, Jaranda? There were alot of questions being posed to opposers, why not the same standards be posed to supporters? Just H 23:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Both sides was very agressive Jaranda wat's sup 03:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll try my best to continue my role as a devil's advocate(which is my nature), while keeping an environment that all people can feel comfortable in. Just H 20:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Both sides was very agressive Jaranda wat's sup 03:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Doesn't that seem like a double standard, Jaranda? There were alot of questions being posed to opposers, why not the same standards be posed to supporters? Just H 23:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- But the main problem is that Just H was very agressive to some the support votes in the bot RFA and that something that would give many oppose votes if an rfa is developing soon Jaranda wat's sup 20:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Don't fret about that. It's common for oppose voters to be bullied by enthusiasts. It's very rude of them but it goes unremarked. You have every right to oppose the adminning of the bot for any reason you choose. I oppose it myself. The guy can write a sekrit script to message him with the names of templates that need protecting and do it by hand but I'll never support adminning an unsupervised bot, for much the same reason you gave. Grace Note 07:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ProtectionBot and User talk:David Levy in response to it. I'd like some feedback on how I handled it. I am a critic of alot of Wikipedia's systems and I would like to try to reform them(the skeptic userbox on my userpage was the closest one I could find to express this). Just H 21:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)