Wikipedia:Editor review/Laleena
Laleena (talk · contribs) I want to be reviewed to see what I need to work harder at, and I want to become an admin.. Please tell me about anything you think I could improve on. Laleena 13:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Reviews
Hi -- I thought I'd do this, since you've reposting this. Well, your edits looks good in general, so that tells me that you're doing a good job. Your previous RFA was premature, but it looks like you've learned from that. You also appear to have really gotten into the swing of using good edit summaries -- something I need to improve on. So, in short, keep up the good work! --Haemo 07:07, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
I checked your recent contribs log and found nothing amiss. You seem to have a good balance of writing and community involvement. I'm not going to look at the ArbCom case unless you specifically ask me to do so: I don't think you have been mentioned by name in the Signpost ArbCom report, so it can't have been too bad. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 22:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I am particularly pleased with my work on Wikiproject Denmark, which I started.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- I was involved in the ArbComm case over Commonwealth R/realms, which was rather nasty, in my opinion. It took a while to get it over with, and I bet it's still going on. And currently, I am onto John Foxe (user).