Wikipedia:Editor review/Mww113

Mww113*[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Archiving this request as user did not transclude the request onto the main page and because a considerable amount of time has passed since this request was made. Netalarmtalk 07:04, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mww113 (talk · contribs) Hey everyone, I just want to know how im doing, what to work on, and what I need to improve. Please review me honestly. Every opinion is appreciated. Thanks! Mww113 (talk) 17:45, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

I've archived this review. Please see the reason listed above. If you wish to be reviewed, please file a new request and remember to transclude it onto the main Editor review page. Netalarmtalk 07:04, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
The things I have to say I am most pleased with, is just interacting with other users. Reverting vandalism and collaborating to further the project. Mww113 (talk) 17:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
Nah. I'm not one for conflict. If I ever was in one I would probably ask for a third opinion. Mediate and Mediate again if the problem persists. I would ultimatly go to ArbCom if it got terrible but I would usually just resolve peacefully via email, talk pages and irc. Mww113 (talk) 17:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Comment I think your oppose rationale at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ynhockey 2 shows a pretty serious misunderstanding of what admins do and how they function. Any trustworthy editor who understands how Wikipedia functions and who has shown the intellectual maturity and character to deal with complex situations should get admin tools. To put it in perspective, imagine that someone had denied you access to the rollback feature by saying "too many editors already have rollback". Pascal.Tesson (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.