Wikipedia:Editor review/Sunny910910
Sunny910910 (talk · contribs) I'm a fairly new editor to wikipedia, I've been here since May of 2007. My primary reason for requesting an editor review because I want to know how I am as an editor. If you could give your opinion, it would be appreciated. Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone 03:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
Review by NASCAR Fan24 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Hello there Sunny910910. I've seen you around Wikipedia, especially on Eragon-related articles (btw, Eragon is probably my favourite book). Anyway, keep up the vandalism reverting and welcoming new users, both are tasks that are essential to the project. However, you should focus on getting more constructive contributions (i.e. besides reverting vandalism). You can:
- Create a few articles - it doesn't look like you have before. Ideas can be found at Requested articles.
- Improve a couple of articles to Good status. This is a great thing to do if you are bored while on Wikipedia. You could also review good articles as any editor can do it and reviewing only takes a few minutes.
- Participate in discussions such as X for deletion, Deletion review, or Requests for comment.
- Help out at the
Happy wiking! NF24(radio me!Editor review) 23:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I mostly work on minor edits, and reverting vandalism, so my edits are mostly not for building articles. Though, my best edits were probably on the Chronicles of Ancient Darkness series.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- I haven't been in conflicts with other editors yet, but if I do, I would talk it out civilly and if that doesn't work, I'll request 3rd opinion.