Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Drama Series/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 10:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Drama Series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 12:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets the every single criteria. Also, I believe it to be well sourced and clear. After much tweaking and further adjustments I feel that it is worthy of being a Featured List. I believe this list is worthy, considering I worked on it with the Featured lists, Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actress in a Drama Series, Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actor in a Drama Series, Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series, Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series, Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series in mind. If you oppose, please address your issues here so they can be resolved. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 12:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Underneath-it-All |
---|
;Comments:
– Underneath-it-All (talk) 01:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support – Underneath-it-All (talk) 12:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 13:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Meets the criteria, and I see no problems.Caringtype1 (talk) 20:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you so much! — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 20:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 21:04, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
Giants2008 (Talk) 21:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Three hyphens in a row is not a dash.
- Done. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 19:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- "et cetera" or "etc.", not "etcetera". Best avoided in formal writing though, if you can rephrase the sentence (or remove it, per next point).
- Done. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 19:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Tell me more in the lead about this specific award. Can you come up with any other superlatives or trends? For the top daytime award I'm sure there's some other interesting info. The program history, origin of the Emmy name, and details about the statuette seem irrelevant here (everything after "Also").
- I can not come up with any other informations/facts since like I said previously the Daytime Emmy Awards are very low profile but the Primetime and Oscars are very popular. If you do not believe me, search it yourself. Trust me, you won't. Furthermore, the program history, origin of the Emmy name are absoutlety needed. Maybe, the statuette isn't but that all the information I could of come up with. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 19:15, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry for the delay, I've been on vacation. You have a stats table for total awards won, how about one for nominations? What is the streak for most wins/nominations in a row for a show? What networks have been the most successful? Do the winners of this often coincide with the Writing Team/Actor/Actress winners? I fail to see why Emmy origins are necessary; we don't explain that 'Oscar' comes from an Uncle Oscar and that it weighs 8 pounds in every Academy Award article. Did the lack of integrity have to do with Outstanding Series balloting? Have there been any winner controversies? Is there a reason why the number of nominees has ranged from 3 to 6? If nothing can be said about the award other than that X, Y and Z won it, I'm not sure why it should be featured. Also, 1994 is missing the yellow. Reywas92Talk 04:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The final sentence of the lead runs on and ought to be split.
- Done. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 19:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Table looks good, though I think the article could use more prose information. How about some statistics about the nominees?
Reywas92Talk 11:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I see no clear problems in the list. The only thing I noticed was the issue with the colors in the ref column, but it has been already discussed and accepted, so I will accept it as well. Cambalachero (talk) 21:05, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. I am going to fix the ref column problem very soon. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 22:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.