Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Malmö FF records and statistics/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 17:10, 11 September 2012 [1].
List of Malmö FF records and statistics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Reckless182 (talk) 23:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the criteria. The list is a collection of all thinkable records and statistics of Malmö FF based on the available references. I hope you like it. --Reckless182 (talk) 23:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments: Five graphs in the records section seems a bit excessive? How reliable is eu-football.info? Ref 3 and 16 have trouble loading for me. Afro (Talk) 12:26, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I could remove the average attendance graphs since they are already included in their respective stadium articles but I think they are informative and relevant to the section at hand. You do have a point about eu-football.info, I'm suddenly not so sure about it's reliability since it is open for edits. Perhaps a third party could help us determine? Unfortunately I've been unable to find this information anywhere else, but I'll keep looking. Ref 3 and 16 works fine for me.--Reckless182 (talk) 13:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You don't think the goal difference graph seems irrelevant to the section? I would suggest the removal of eu-football.info, it says it posts the sources for data confirmation however since it doesn't directly attribute any source to one of their pages, it's unreliable at the very least. Afro (Talk) 05:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it's relevant and interesting, the list contains both records and statistics, the graph is an interesting piece of statistics. I removed the internationals section with the eu-football.info refs, unfortunately I couldn't find another reference to support the section. --Reckless182 (talk) 14:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- How is it relevant to the section though, at no point is goal difference mentioned. Afro (Talk) 04:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry but you're mistaken. Goaldifference is mentioned under Allsvenskan records held by the club in the same section. Various goal records are also discussed. I don't see why you're so much against the graph? It's a nice piece of statistics in a list for records and statistics.--Reckless182 (talk) 21:23, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Update. The graph is now removed after discussion with The Rambling Man (see below).--Reckless182 (talk) 13:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I feel this list is not standalone and rather outlined, as the entries are partially forked from other articles. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 16:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The only thing that I have borrowed is the table layout in the players section, the table of European record and the honours (although this entry includes more titles than in the main article). Everything else is unique to the list, I don't see the problem? --Reckless182 (talk) 17:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 19:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 23:03, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 22:13, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments'
NapHit (talk) 14:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support NapHit (talk) 22:13, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! --Reckless182 (talk) 11:30, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. TBrandley 15:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you!--Reckless182 (talk) 16:23, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Bloom6132 (talk) 21:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- Support – meets all 6 criteria. Great work! —Bloom6132 (talk) 21:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! --Reckless182 (talk) 22:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, great work as usual Reckless! —Cliftonian (talk) 12:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Cheers man! --Reckless182 (talk) 12:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.