Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of TNA King of the Mountain Champions/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 17:13, 8 September 2015 [1].
List of TNA King of the Mountain Champions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): WillC 09:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've nominated this list twice before. It has mostly failed because of not many reviews. Any body who reviews this I will review a list you have nominated in return. I will most likely be reviewing a couple of lists anyway. In the first nom, the main page was desired to be expanded. I have done that to the best extent possible at this time. Has alot of history and I kept it concise. The main page is a GA on its own. The second nom didn't really have any issues to solve. I've updated it and included some new references. Mostly it is still in the same shape as my last nom so it didn't take alot of expanding, just clean up to get it ready for this nomination.--WillC 09:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Azealia911 talk 18:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments from Azealia911
Sorry it took you so long to get this passed, especially due to lack of input. Here's some comments, if you have time to review this FLC I opened, I'd appreciate it :)
Think that's everything I spotted, Azealia911 talk 10:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support per my comments being addressed. Good work! Hopefully the last time it'll be nominated. Azealia911 talk 18:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "Reigns that occurred on TNA's television program TNA Impact!, or its later title Impact Wrestling, usually air on tape delay" - I don't like this wording at all. Firstly, the reigns don't occur on tape delay, the title changes do. I also don't like the way the two titles are shown. I would have "Title changes that occurred on TNA's television program Impact Wrestling (known as TNA Impact! until [date]), usually air on tape delay"
- Done
- PPV => Pay-per-view (or at the very least wikilink it for those who may not know what "PPV" stands for)
- Done
- "as a result of being GFW founder, the title was also featured in GFW along with TNA" - the title was not the founder of GFW - change to "as a result of being his being the founder of GFW, the title was also featured in GFW...."
- Done
- "The inaugural champion was Booker T, who unveiled the title belt and declared himself the first champion on the October 23, 2008 episode of Impact" - you basically just said all this in the previous paragraph, no need to state it all again
- Removed for the most part.
- "The title was then-known" - no need for the hyphen
- Done
- "The title is vacated after Jeff Jarrett becomes TNA General Manager" - this is the only note that is in the present tense, all others are in past tense, be consistent
- Done, hadn't noticed.
- "Each wrestler's total number of days as champion are ranked highest to lowest" => "Each wrestler's total number of days as champion is ranked highest to lowest" (the subject of the sentence is the singular word "number")
- Done
- "Reigns that occurred on TNA's television program TNA Impact!, or its later title Impact Wrestling, usually air on tape delay" - I don't like this wording at all. Firstly, the reigns don't occur on tape delay, the title changes do. I also don't like the way the two titles are shown. I would have "Title changes that occurred on TNA's television program Impact Wrestling (known as TNA Impact! until [date]), usually air on tape delay"
- That's all I spotted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:06, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- All concerns addressed, thank you for your comments.--WillC 04:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I made one tweak to the lead because it would take less time than detailing it here, and am now happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:10, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you--WillC 11:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment from Maile66
- I see one issue:
- MOS:DTT scope="col" and scope="row" needs to be on every column and row of the tables. I did the first table for you, so you can see. Do you think you could do that on the rows and columns of the tables? — Maile (talk) 16:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you mind explaining why exactly? I do believe the old format was like that but it was changed for a reason.--WillC 17:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know about the old format. But I know it's being required of the current lists. — Maile (talk) 17:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, can you introduce how it is supposed to go in the first reign box and the #1 in the combined reigns table so I know how to properly add it?--WillC 17:55, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- OK - I started it for you on each table. It's like this. For the columns ,!scope="col"| is to the left of everything. You only need to do it at the top for each column header:
- !scope="col"| if all you have is a plain column header
- !scope="col" style="background:#e3e3e3" width=0%| # if you have style information set up
- For the rows, |scope="row"| is also to the left of everything. You only need to put it in front of the first item in the row:
- |scope="row"|
- Good luck. — Maile (talk) 19:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, I went through and added the code. If I've done something incorrectly it is mostly because I'm just not as familiar with tables as I used to be.--WillC 04:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- OK - I started it for you on each table. It's like this. For the columns ,!scope="col"| is to the left of everything. You only need to do it at the top for each column header:
- Alright, can you introduce how it is supposed to go in the first reign box and the #1 in the combined reigns table so I know how to properly add it?--WillC 17:55, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know about the old format. But I know it's being required of the current lists. — Maile (talk) 17:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you mind explaining why exactly? I do believe the old format was like that but it was changed for a reason.--WillC 17:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - You got most of it, and I tidied the small amount otherwise. If you have time, I could use a review of Leo Carrillo. — Maile (talk) 12:22, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Once I find some free time I certainly will. Thank you.--WillC 21:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 17:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.