Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Serbia/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of World Heritage Sites in Serbia[edit]
List of World Heritage Sites in Serbia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Following some related FL examples, such as the List of World Heritage Sites in Slovenia, I believe this list meets all criteria. Some prose tweaks may be required but I expect this to be sorted during the nomination process. Tone 15:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- As I mentioned for the Croatia list, there's no need for a 'Shared with' column. The description of the graveyards already has the other countries in the description, and the frontiers of the Roman Empire could easily include it. Reywas92Talk 01:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment as I noted at the Croatia list, this can't be sorted chronologically. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from BeatlesLedTV
- Center the year columns.
- Center the image columns, or at the the Start Ras image. Looks weird left aligned.
That's all I got. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:31, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 23:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 22:35, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 09:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from Hameltion (talk, contribs) 14:15, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
* Change "Currently" in lead to "As of" with {{As of}}?
I've additionally made these tweaks. --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 16:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support—I also added one more as of template for good measure :) --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 14:15, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 22:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- Support – All of my concerns have been addressed and I believe this meets FL standards. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; I'm not a fan of including the website address in the references but you're using it consistently and also have the organization name, so it's not opposable. Promoting. --PresN 14:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.