Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Eat Bulaga!/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of accolades received by Eat Bulaga!

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Eat Bulaga!/archive1

Nominator(s): Chompy Ace 23:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this another diverse topic from the Philippines since 24 Oras accolades list. Chompy Ace 23:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"Since its premiere, Eat Bulaga! is the longest-running variety show in the Philippines" - first three words are redundant as obviously it can't have been the longest-running before its premiere
"in the creation of the international spin-off programs" - saying "the" international spin-off programs suggests that you are going to name them. So either name them or lose the "the"
"and the global popularity on social media" => "and global popularity on social media"
"Eat Bulaga! garnered awards and nominations in various categories" "has garnered" would be more appropriate if the show is still ongoing
"It won nineteen awards" => "It has won nineteen awards" (as above)
"The show received twenty-one" => The show has received twenty-one" (as above)
This might be accurate, but did the show really not win any awards at all for the first 21 years of its existence and then suddenly start receiving multiple awards pretty much every year?
On the PMPC Star Awards for Television > 2012 > Best Male TV Host row, the recipient's name sorts incorrectly
That's what I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisTheDude, all done except the seventh point which I believe that the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s did not have circulation on Philippine media for the show's awards, as did some years of the 2000s (e.g. the 2004 PMPC TV ceremony or the nominations of the 2006 PMPC TV ceremony). This should be addressed as well. Chompy Ace 15:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisTheDude, are you there? Chompy Ace 23:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but (although it may sometimes seem otherwise) I do have a life away from WP and yesterday evening I was not at my computer. I will look at this one again later -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I guess if there are genuinely no sources for any awards prior to 2000 then I guess we either have to assume that the show didn't win any or that the ones it did weren't notable -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from TheDoctorWho

"It has won nineteen awards from the Box Office Entertainment Awards." -> "It has won nineteen Box Office Entertainment Awards.", avoids duplication of "awards" and aligns it with the other awards named/linked.
There's one place in the table where you linked Eat Bulaga! in parenthesis and five where you didn't. Whether you link the other five or unlink the one, I'd make it consistent.
I'd link God Gave Me You in the awards table.
Reference 8 has an author
Link Philippine Entertainment Portal in reference 14 just for consistency with the rest
Reference 38 has the publisher cited as Philstar while all other references from this url list the website as The Philippine Star. Any reason for the difference?

Not much else for me to say, the prose is pretty short and the list itself seems largely complete. TheDoctorWho (talk) 23:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TheDoctorWho, done. Chompy Ace 08:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, has my support! TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from ZooBlazer

I struggled to find any issues, as it seems like pretty much everything has already been cleaned up with the above comments.

Image review passes - The lone image is the logo in the infobox. It is properly licensed, has alt text, and sourced; the original link is dead, but the archive link works.

With that said, I'm happy to Support. Another very well done accolades article by you. -- ZooBlazer 16:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --Pres N 15:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.