Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Brian Lara/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 03:36, 28 February 2010 [1].
List of international cricket centuries by Brian Lara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Nominator(s): ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 12:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
Another cricket centuries list, following the style of my previous FLC's and other already existing lists. Looking forward to your comments and suggestions. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 12:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This is a WikiCup nomination. To the nominator: if you do not intend to submit this article at the WikiCup, feel free to remove this notice. Mm40 (talk) 12:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, it is. Sorry, I didn't know I was supposed to mention that. I suppose I should check out the talk pages more often. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 12:47, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Harrias (talk) 17:28, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments
|
Everything else looks fine to me, another nice centuries list, well done. Harrias (talk) 16:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your suggestions. I've made some changes to the article. What do you think? I'd also appreciate your views on the numbers issue. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 01:37, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Yeah, on reading that section (which I've read many times, but missed that clause!) I'm happy with your numbers, honestly I prefer like that anyway! Harrias (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your suggestions. I've made some changes to the article. What do you think? I'd also appreciate your views on the numbers issue. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 01:37, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments excellent list...
The Rambling Man (talk) 18:28, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support great work. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
"His accomplishments with the bat saw himbeingchosen as the...". Tiny bit of wordiness that can easily be removed. I don't even think it needs a replacement word.
- Done
"as well one of the Wisden Cricketers of the Year in 1995." Missing "as" after "well".
- Done
Should general references be placed before specific?Giants2008 (27 and counting) 01:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Done: This is how I have done it in most of my articles, but I don't see a problem with it either way. Thanks for your suggestions. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 01:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Another very good cricket list. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 03:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - all looks good to me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.