Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/August-2021

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.


	Older Archive
	Miscellaneous Archive
2004:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2005:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2006:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2007:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2008:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2011:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2012:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2013:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2014:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2015:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2016:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2017:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2018:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2019:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2020:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2021:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2022:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2023:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2024:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

Cliff Palace

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2021 at 13:04:31 (UTC)

Reason: Good capture. High resolution.
Articles in which this image appears: Cliff Palace
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: Bubba73

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment from the photographer - This photo was taken after I lost the Sun. There are several in commons category Category:Cliff Palace that were taken while the late-afternoon Sun was still on them that I think look better, e.g. File:Cliff Palace, Mesa Verde Park, Colorado, US (01).jpg and several following that one. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 03:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – for the EV (criterion 5). The composition puts it in context, and lack of harsh shadows is a plus. Bammesk (talk) 00:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:23, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:23, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boomerang

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2021 at 13:26:34 (UTC)

Reason: High quality. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Boomerang
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle
Creator: A.Savin

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 13:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Meh. – Sca (talk) 12:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not good to illustrate article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? --A.Savin (talk) 11:07, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Because it's not clear at a glance what the heck it is. This shot is better at that, IMO. – Sca (talk) 12:07, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly disagree. --A.Savin (talk) 13:30, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No doubt recognizable to boomerang fans, but to the general reader probably not. – Sca (talk) 13:07, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How is then File:Boomerang.jpg recognizable as boomerang to the general reader? I'm a general reader for sure and for me it rather looks like a Clothes hanger without hook. And it's a terrible photo. --A.Savin (talk) 23:32, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The shape of that boomerang (admittedly a very low quality photo) is recognizable, but this current candidate looks more like a piece from some Alvar Aalto furniture... ;-) --Janke | Talk 06:47, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:08, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Northern masked weaver female (2)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2021 at 15:12:08 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Reworked from RAW since previous nomination.
Articles in which this image appears: Northern masked weaver
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:12, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 13:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:43, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 08:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Janke | Talk 06:48, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lemonreader (talk) 13:14, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ×Elvorix^talk 07:42, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I struck the above vote, editor has less than 100 edits. See instructions on top of this page. Bammesk (talk) 00:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ Comment – Fine feathery pic., but target article is a tiny 43-word sub-stub drastically unsuitable for main page promotion, thus not eligible for POTD (particularly since comp. is vertical). – Sca (talk) 12:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is FPC, not POTD. Your opinion in this discussion had no support. This image is not being proposed as suitable for POTD. Suitability for POTD has not been agreed as an FP criteria, so please do not invent criteria. And to suggest that an image cannot be POTD as it is 'vertical' is a nonsense statement. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:32, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My "opinion" was a factual explanation about the structure of Wikipedia – which, be it noted, I did not devise: All nominations here at Featured Picture Candidates, if approved, are perforce potential choices for the POTD. Those who don't like it can lump it. (I decline to comment on your "nonsense" jibe.) – Sca (talk) 13:15, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS: This nom. could be promoted if the 'article' were substantially expanded. – Sca (talk) 13:15, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sca:, you are wrong. Read POTD guidelines. It says FPs don't have to become POTD, for instance when article quality is low. This is FPC, not POTD, so read the FP criteria too and the instructions on top of FPC page. In the past you said you disagree with the FP criteria, diff nom, and that you don't go by it diff nom. If you disagree with the FP process, start a RFC on the project's talk page. Adding invalid oppose rationales and comments to FP nominations is Disruptive. Bammesk (talk) 14:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not responsible for every glitch in Wiki instructions. Standards for Main Page play are what they are. Please don't ping me again with such prolix protests, whoever you are. Adieu. – Sca (talk) 17:48, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no glitch. You disagree with the FP process. FPC is not POTD. Bammesk (talk) 14:25, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This disagreement is not helping the FP project. Sca's opinion is quite reasonable, but surely we cannot allow oppose votes on criteria which are not part of the current guidelines. Could an admin (if any watch this page) help us out please. In the meantime I have initiated a vote. Please participate. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:30, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No thanks, I'm probably not qualified. – Sca (talk) 13:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't changed my position or understanding of Wikipedia one bit, but I'm sick & tired of all this overwrought kerfuffle, so I changed my evil opsn to a 'comment.' Is everybody happy now? – Sca (talk) 13:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Northern masked weaver (Ploceus taeniopterus) female.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gatekeeper butterfly

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2021 at 15:18:50 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Important for article.
Articles in which this image appears: Gatekeeper (butterfly)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:18, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 13:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:42, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 08:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Janke | Talk 06:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lemonreader (talk) 13:13, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ×Elvorix^talk 07:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I struck the above vote, editor has less than 100 edits. See instructions on top of this page. Bammesk (talk) 00:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Gatekeeper (Pyronia tithonus) underside.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spotted pardalote

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2021 at 18:41:31 (UTC)

Reason: Illustrates subject well, high resolution, concurrent nomination on Commons doing very well.
Articles in which this image appears: Spotted pardalote
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – MER-C 18:41, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose – Background looks unnatural. My guess is that the background is overprocessed, but regardless of whether it is or isn't, flat backgrounds look unnatural on live animal photos captured in the wild (with the exception of night photos having a dark background). Image has EV, hence weak oppose. On a sidenote, we have a FP of this bird: here which should be delisted if this nom passes. Bammesk (talk) 20:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think JJ will have overprocessed the background. MER-C, can you delist as suggested please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:34, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 08:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ×Elvorix^talk 07:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I struck the above vote, editor has less than 100 edits. See instructions on top of this page. Bammesk (talk) 00:27, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 11:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 12:03, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Pardalotus punctatus - Glen Davis.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nassarius arcularia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2021 at 18:59:01 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC a few months ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Nassarius arcularia, Nassarius
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Molluscs
Creator: H. Zell

Support as nominator – MER-C 18:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 08:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Janke | Talk 06:50, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lemonreader (talk) 13:13, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ×Elvorix^talk 07:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I struck the above vote, editor has less than 100 edits. See instructions on top of this page. Bammesk (talk) 00:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 11:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Nassarius arcularia 01.JPG --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brisbane

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2021 at 13:25:36 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution. Good composition.
Articles in which this image appears: Brisbane, Brisbane River, List of Australian capital cities, Queensland
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
Creator: Kgbo

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 13:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Meh - very snapshotty... --Janke | Talk 06:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Agree – and perspective looks skewed. – Sca (talk) 12:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Taken from the wrong place? The foreground isn't relevant. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:46, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I stand with above --Andrei (talk) 21:18, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:29, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Highway

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2021 at 13:36:47 (UTC)

Reason: Good capture. A recent POTD on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Taylor Highway
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Others
Creator: Poco a poco

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 13:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Asphalt comprises about half of the pixels. – Sca (talk) 12:46, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, too much road. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:42, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:29, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sella group

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2021 at 13:58:50 (UTC)

Reason: Good capture. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Sella group
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
Creator: Llez

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 13:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lemonreader (talk) 13:13, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ×Elvorix^talk 07:44, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I struck the above vote, editor has less than 100 edits. See instructions on top of this page. Bammesk (talk) 00:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 11:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sella group - View from West.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:46, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Puffin

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2021 at 12:44:56 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Adds value to article.
Articles in which this image appears: Atlantic puffin, Puffin
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:44, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Adorable, surprised it hasnt been featured before --Andrei (talk) 21:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the posture and the background in this photo a lot more than in the one below. --Janke | Talk 10:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support This picture has a less disturbed background than the below one. Lemonreader (talk) 13:12, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ×Elvorix^talk 07:44, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I struck the above vote, editor has less than 100 edits. See instructions on top of this page. Bammesk (talk) 00:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 11:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Puffin (Fratercula arctica).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:22, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paris Las Vegas

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2021 at 13:10:55 (UTC)

Reason: High quality, large size, good composition, and shows the property clearly. This photo also has been retouched to remove sensor dust in the sky and some artifacts from the window glass in the sky.
Articles in which this image appears: Paris Las Vegas
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Jürgen Matern (on Wikimedia Commons)

Support as nominator – Lemonreader (talk) 13:10, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ×Elvorix^talk 07:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I struck the above vote, editor has less than 100 edits. See instructions on top of this page. Bammesk (talk) 00:20, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:31, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:31, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Banded demoiselle

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2021 at 20:57:24 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Banded demoiselle
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Delicate image of demoiselle at work. V. good res. (Homogenized background a bit puzzling, but can be ignored.) – Sca (talk) 13:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The background is the Thames. It has not been modified. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:27, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And I thought 'twas the Mersey! – Sca (talk) 13:46, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support – The colors are well-parsed. Overall, nice. - Lemonreader (talk) 14:59, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Muhammad(talk) 07:57, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 14:22, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Banded demoiselle damselfly (Calopteryx splendens) male 4.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:13, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Green shield bug

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2021 at 21:07:51 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Green shield bug
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The second antenna is muted, almost invisibe (see for example [1], [2], [3]), I assume because it's pointing toward the lens. Is there a way to make it more pronounced in the focus stack? Bammesk (talk) 14:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is pointed towards the lens. A focus stack does not create sharpness, it only combines the sharpest elements of each shot. Charlesjsharp (talk)

Support – Ok. It's pretty good as is. Bammesk (talk) 14:10, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Object on focus, overall well-pictured. - Lemonreader (talk) 15:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 14:22, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Green shield bug (Palomena prasina) 3.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:16, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coronavirus. SARS-CoV-2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2021 at 01:42:27 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Spike protein, SARS-CoV-2, Template:COVID-19 pandemic sidebar, Coronavirus
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Biology
Creator: Alexey Solodovnikov (Idea, Producer, CG, Editor), Valeria Arkhipova (Scientific Сonsultant)

Support as nominator – Niklitov (talk) 01:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For reference: The image was placed in the two articles today/yesterday [4], [5] (see FP critierion 5). The image was published (publication link) on 29 July 2021 in the N+1 science website (traslation). The Commons nomination is at this link. I am not a specialist and cannot judge the scientific significance or accuracy of the image. Personally I think, assuming that the N+1 website is not a peer-reviewed publication, we should wait a while (at least a few months) and see if any concerns are raised about this image in the talk pages of the two articles the image was added to. Bammesk (talk) 15:39, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose criterion 5 Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:35, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

until further discussion. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for now. --Janke | Talk 16:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – IMO the world is tired of pics & depictions of the ƒ₴*!@$#?&! Virus. – Sca (talk) 12:54, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – Dear Colleagues Janke, Charlesjsharp, Bammesk, Sca! Before publication on the N+1 popular science portal, the image received 3 reviews from scientific consultants:

Nikitin N.A., Doctor of Biological Sciences, Department of Virology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Borisevich S.S. PhD in Chemical Sciences, Specialist in Molecular Modeling of Viral Surface Proteins, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Chemical Physics, Ufa Institute of Chemistry RAS.
Arkhipova V.I., specialization in Fundamental and Applied chemistry, senior engineer, RNA Chemistry Laboratory, Institute of chemical biology and fundamental medicine SB Russian Academy of Sciences.

The N+1 article itself talks about this. Criterion 5 is ok, right? – Niklitov (talk) 20:20, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, to the general, non-scientific person, they all look more or less the same. – Sca (talk) 22:13, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this isn't really aesthetically pleasing, it's too irregular, and the "spikes" seem a bit too big compared to the "real" electron microscope images we've seen... --Janke | Talk 08:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Janke, per file description and image captions this is the "model of the 'external' structure", (struck per explanation below) ~~so the spikes are not to scale compared to the body. The intricate spike details are magnified here.~~ This may not be the best image for the infobox (the article editors will decide that). I will support if the image remains stable in the article(s) for a few months (infobox or not). It adds significant EV to the article(s) IMO. Bammesk (talk) 02:54, 4 August 2021 (UTC) Bammesk (talk) 00:33, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hello! Thank you for your comments, I will try to answer.
When aesthetics is on one side of the scale and scientific credibility on the other, we choose science. You can see from the micrographs that the spike proteins should be arranged irregularly. We also took into account the flexibility of the S-proteins and reflected it in our model. The virus looks less neat now, but all sacrifices are in the name of science.
Next, we need to remember two facts about the size of the coronavirus. The first is that SARS-СoV-2 does not have a strictly defined size - it is in a wide range of diameters. The size can be either 60 or 150 nm. Second, the size of the S-protein is determined more precisely, approximately 30 nm. So, it turns out that the ratio of the spike protein and the "body" of the virus may differ. We have chosen averages to create our model.
We can find many sources confirming the truth of the dimensions of the parts of our model, but I will refer to one from Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2665-2
If you pay attention to the relative sizes of spikes and virion in the electron micrographes in Fig. 1, their length ratio will be 0.35. In our model, the ratio of the lengths of our spike to the size of the virus is 0.32. It seems to me that the numbers have been successfully confirmed by science? I hope I managed to clarify this question ;) AlexeySolodovnikov (talk) 12:12, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For reference: AlexeySolodovnikov and Valeria Arkhipova became the winners of the Wiki-Science competition (1st of March - 30st of April 2021): first place in one of the nominations and award from the Science TV channel. The image was placed in the articles SARS-CoV-2 (in russian) from 21 may 2021: the image in the article (infobox) has remained stable for over 2.5 months (= few months). What is your opinion, Bammesk, Charlesjsharp and Janke: is it worth waiting further and are you satisfied with the arguments from the author of the image? The depiction of the day on Wikimedia Commons (8 Aug) also revealed no criticism of the model. — Niklitov (talk) 17:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am satisfied with the arguments from the author, but. We have had science images that passed nominations which needed (minor) corrections. We (the reviewers) aren't experts. This nomination is just too soon. As I mentioned above I would like to give the image some time in en-Wiki before supporting. Bammesk (talk) 01:17, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not my scene. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:00, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:07, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rock of Ifach Natural Park

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2021 at 01:27:48 (UTC)

Reason: Quality lead image. Shows the main feature of the park.
Articles in which this image appears: Penyal d'Ifac Natural Park
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Others
Creator: Diego Delso

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 01:27, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Impressive, but doesn't show the entire, massive rock - from the side, it's about three times wider than seen in this view. --Janke | Talk 11:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Support – Well, it sure looks BIG, and res is pretty good. I can imagine a POTD copy block comparing its size or height with Gibralter's. Leaning toward support. – Sca (talk) 12:46, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support when I was there it looked like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:25, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, and it still does! ;-) But if you look at it on Google Earth in "3D", you'll see that it looks even more massive from the south, instead of the west... BTW, I'm leaning toward support, too. --Janke | Talk 14:32, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 14:21, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:25, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Peñón de Ifach, Calpe, España, 2014-07-01, DD 14.JPG --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:11, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft Industries L 410 NG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2021 at 16:30:46 (UTC)

Reason: good quality and ev
Articles in which this image appears: Aircraft Industries L 410 NG, Let Kunovice
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Air#Civilian
Creator: Julian Herzog

Support as nominator – Andrei (talk) 16:30, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – --GRDN711 (talk) 22:34, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 14:21, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:26, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:LET L-410NG OK-NGA ILA Berlin 2016 09.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fushimi Inari-taisha (2021)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2021 at 18:58:13 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons two years ago; higher resolution and better composition than existing FP File:KyotoFushimiInariLarge.jpg (will be nominated for delisting if this nomination is successful).
Articles in which this image appears: Fushimi Inari-taisha + others on replacement
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Religion and mythology
Creator: Basile Morin

Support as nominator – MER-C 18:58, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC
Support – Does the image caption in the article fit this photo? The caption is inherited from the previous photo. Bammesk (talk) 02:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It fits, except it's the opposite direction. Amended. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:56, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 14:21, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Torii path with lantern at Fushimi Inari Taisha Shrine, Kyoto, Japan.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:11, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added image to Places/Others instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:11, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Processional Way, Babylon

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2021 at 19:03:09 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously. Very high resolution.
Articles in which this image appears: Lion of Babylon etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture
Creator: Unknown/Google Art Project

Support as nominator – MER-C 19:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:20, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Isn't it tilted just a tiny bit or are my eyes deceiving me? --Muhammad(talk) 07:47, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, thank you! --Andrei (talk) 22:19, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 14:21, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Processional Way, Babylon - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:20, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added to Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Religion and mythology instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:20, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Power station Berlin-Wilmersdorf

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2021 at 19:36:10 (UTC)

Reason: Future FP on Commons. Good capure.
Articles in which this image appears: Power station Berlin-Wilmersdorf
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: A.Savin

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:36, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – too much road in front, and too little power plant IMO. Bammesk (talk) 02:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --A.Savin (talk) 06:22, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 14:21, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Niklitov (talk) 20:26, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salepçioğlu Mosque (interior)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2021 at 18:10:16 (UTC)

Reason: FP on Commons. Was seen as a POTD on the Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Salepçioğlu Mosque
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Creator: A.Savin

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 18:10, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Composition, with its narrow crop, seems somewhat claustrophobic. – Sca (talk) 22:15, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:05, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jacky winter

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2021 at 11:28:12 (UTC)

Reason: Was just seen on Commons FPC, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Jacky winter
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:28, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 09:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's a halo around the tail feathers. Is the background heavily processed or synthetic? --Janke | Talk 18:11, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bombus ruderarius

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2021 at 11:31:25 (UTC)

Reason: Was just seen on Commons FPC where it was featured unanimously. High enough resolution to see the pollen.
Articles in which this image appears: Bombus ruderarius, Taraxacum officinale
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:31, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Poor DOF, blurry in places. – Sca (talk) 12:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grounded Boeing 737 MAX aircraft in Seattle

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2021 at 02:55:40 (UTC)

Reason: High EV depicting the Boeing 737 MAX groundings, a major pre-pandemic event in global aviation.
Articles in which this image appears: Boeing 737 MAX groundings, Boeing 737 MAX, 2 others
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Air
Creator: SounderBruce

Support as nominator – Sounder Bruce 02:55, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Messy composition, just a snapshot. Rear ends are not very picturesque. Low EV. --Janke | Talk 10:53, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per Janke. Fails Criterion 3. – Sca (talk) 12:44, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – I agree, it's a muddled composition. Bammesk (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:46, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mating Skippers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2021 at 11:34:19 (UTC)

Reason: A very detailed good quality macro shot of mating skippers.
Articles in which this image appears: Oberthür's grizzled skipper
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: User:Assyrtiko

Support as nominator – Assyrtiko (talk) 11:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please renominate when it has been stable in article. It should not be in skipper article. I suggest nominate at FP in Commons before here. Not very big image. Should identify male and female. Top one is worn specimen. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:07, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:46, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infanta Margarita Teresa in a Blue Dress

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2021 at 19:41:22 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution. FP on Spanish Wikipedia
Articles in which this image appears: Infanta Margarita Teresa in a Blue Dress, others
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Diego Velázquez

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:41, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:38, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna del Prato

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2021 at 20:06:56 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution
Articles in which this image appears: Madonna del Prato (Raphael), others
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Raphael

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 20:06, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ×Elvorix^talk 10:46, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:38, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:38, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David with the Head of Goliath

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2021 at 19:51:48 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution.
Articles in which this image appears: David with the Head of Goliath (Caravaggio, Vienna), Kunsthistorisches Museum, List of paintings by Caravaggio
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Caravaggio

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:51, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gruesome support --Janke | Talk 15:12, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 12:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 10:07, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ×Elvorix^talk 10:45, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Caravaggio - David with the Head of Goliath - Vienna.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Maiden (Klimt)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2021 at 07:24:43 (UTC)

Reason: Great quality (be careful with the size) and EV, as it appears in the main article about the artist and the article about the national museum
Articles in which this image appears: Gustav Klimt, National Gallery Prague, List of paintings by Gustav Klimt, The Maiden (Klimt)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Gustav Klimt

Support as nominator – Andrei (talk) 07:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:00, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Colorful, good rez. More than a century later, Klimt remains evocative – and provocative. – Sca (talk) 12:22, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:40, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Janke | Talk 15:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 12:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 10:06, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ×Elvorix^talk 10:46, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:KlimtDieJungfrau.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:30, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A drop of water on polyester

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2021 at 10:10:04 (UTC)

Reason: good shot of showing textile water resistancy on polyester
Articles in which this image appears: Polyester
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Materials science
Creator: Petar Milošević

Support as nominator – Petar Milošević (talk) 10:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Lacks EV. – Sca (talk) 11:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I concur. --Janke | Talk 15:56, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Nice photo (interesting reflection on the water droplet). But doesn't add significant EV to the article. Mainly because the article says little (almost none) about water resistivity (repellence) of polyester. Bammesk (talk) 14:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Does not add enough value to article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:44, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment suggest adding to Waterproof fabric. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:13, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Calliopejen1 Done --Petar Milošević (talk) 21:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:09, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Van Wagenen House

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2021 at 18:47:50 (UTC)

Reason: Good capture.
Articles in which this image appears: Van Wagenen House
FP category for this image: Places/Architecture
Creator: King of Hearts

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 18:47, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Is the wide angle really necessary? Presumably to avoid waiting for a time when no cars are parked outside in the street. And the colour balance looks very artificial. ProfDEH (talk) 19:07, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's not just about parked cars; there is a fence around the house, and tons of telephone wires running above the sidewalk area. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Well, if you want a photo with the bottom of the house not covered by the fence around the lot, you need to be inside it - and use a wide angle lens... --Janke | Talk 19:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nomination! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Limited EV, no wow-factor to me. --Tagooty (talk) 10:48, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:49, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2021 at 18:51:18 (UTC)

Reason: Good capture.
Articles in which this image appears: Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment
Creator: Petar Milošević

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 18:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Free adv. – Sca (talk) 12:14, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Purple lens looks so good.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 12:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Purple lens looks fakey. – Sca (talk) 14:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 13:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
min kameera 194.71.0.58 (talk) 14:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose These lenses are not transparent, not purple. See [6] and [7] for instance. Nick-D (talk) 08:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nick-D, this is common for a multi-coated lens [8], [9], which most lenses are these days [10]. At ~45 degree angle one sees the reflection off of the lens coating. There are many examples on the web [11]. Here are two versions of the same lens, with and without multi-coating [12], description [13]. The tint can also be blue or green [14]. I have 3 lenses that do this, one of them reflects the same color as the nom image. Bammesk (talk) 03:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Good quality, but a routine product photo, limited EV. --Tagooty (talk) 10:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have to explain that one to me. We have an article on the very camera itself. We have a good-quality picture of that very camera. How on Earth is that "limited EV"? The featured picture criteria itself states that an image has more encyclopedic value (often abbreviated to "EV" or "enc" in discussions) if it contributes strongly to a single article, rather than contributing weakly to many. -- Veggies (talk) 00:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Limited in that only a few photographers interested in Olympus cameras will read the article. Limited compared to more popular brands, and compared to other articles on a river or a mountain or a town. --Tagooty (talk) 03:05, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Agree with above. --Janke | Talk 14:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – It is what it is: a very good-quality photo of a camera. If we're going to have electronic products in and of themselves as featured pictures, I can't see why this one wouldn't qualify. -- Veggies (talk) 00:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Olympus E-M1 Mark III Zuiko 12-100mm.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna of the Rosary

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2021 at 19:00:35 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution.
Articles in which this image appears: Madonna of the Rosary (Caravaggio), List of paintings by Caravaggio, Kunsthistorisches Museum, Rosary
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Caravaggio

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:50, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Games

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2021 at 19:09:05 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution and recently restored.
Articles in which this image appears: Children's Games (Bruegel), others
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Pieter Bruegel the Elder

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Strangely bleached-out colors in the top left portion of the image - compare with other image on file page. --Janke | Talk 19:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I reverted to the original upload as sourced Here. The bleached-out colors were the doing of an editor and unsourced. Pinging participants @TheFreeWorld and Janke: Bammesk (talk) 15:06, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 21:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:51, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:51, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meshes of the Afternoon

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2021 at 23:36:47 (UTC)

Original – Meshes of the Afternoon is a 1943 American short experimental film directed by and starring wife-and-husband team Maya Deren and Alexandr Hackenschmied.

Reason: As one of the most influential experimental films and being added to the National Film Registry in the registry's second year, this film has more than enough pedigree to be a Featured Picture.
Articles in which this image appears: Meshes of the Afternoon
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: Maya Deren and Alexandr Hackenschmied

Support as nominator – GamerPro64 23:36, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - where's the sound? The article says "Experimental electronic artist Sd Laika used samples from the film's soundtrack for the track "Meshes" on his debut album" --Janke | Talk 10:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The original print didn't have sound. The soundtrack was added in 1959. GamerPro64 14:26, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Ditto. Weird. EV not evident. – Sca (talk) 12:10, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – soundtrack isn't part of the original film per the article and sources. Bammesk (talk) 15:23, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – having the entire content of a film listed by a BBC critics' poll as the 40th-greatest American movie ever made seems like decent EV to me. As Bammesk says, the soundtrack wasn't original. TSP (talk) 14:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:51, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:51, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeongjo of Joseon

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2021 at 16:24:20 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously. High resolution.
Articles in which this image appears: Yeongjo of Joseon etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/East Asian art
Creator: Jang Gyeong-ju and Kim Du-ryang(Original work), Chae Yong-Shin, Cho Seok-Jin; National Palace Museum of Korea

Support as nominator – MER-C 16:24, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:43, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If the file is too large for your browser, open it in ZoomViewer: Here. Bammesk (talk) 01:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 17:28, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 11:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Portrait of King Yeongjo - Chae Yong Shin (蔡龍臣 1850-1941) Cho Seok-jin (趙錫晉 1853-1920) et (cropped).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added image to People/Royalty and nobility instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Picea abies cone

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2021 at 18:22:10 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Picea abies
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Others
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 18:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Nice resolution! There are even some pollen grains visible... --Janke | Talk 17:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking image, and widely used. --Tagooty (talk) 10:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 10:06, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 11:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Picea abies young female cone - Keila.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:50, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vexilla vexillum

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2021 at 10:22:49 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution. Future FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Vexilla vexillum
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Molluscs
Creator: Llez

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 10:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose stub article. —kallerna 08:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:19, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

″Head of Woman″ by Pablo Picasso (1908)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2021 at 21:07:22 (UTC)

Reason: reshot and now in high quality, WB done on the spot and biger resolution
Articles in which this image appears: National Museum of Serbia
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Pablo Picasso

Support as nominator – Petar Milošević (talk) 21:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment how do we know this was published (as opposed to merely painted) before 1926? Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:11, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I overwrite previous edition. True, date is wrong, it is 1909 painting. As stated in museum, it is Erich Šlomovič collection, adressed as a Head of a Woman. With note : The painting was done in the summer of 1909, during Picasso's stay in the Spanish town of Horta de Ebro and it is one of the representative examples of Analytical Cubism. The model for the series of portraits executed in various techniques in drawing, paintings and sculptures, created between the spring and winter of 1909, depicting a female bust or head, was Fernande Olivier. In these works Picasso endeavoured to consistently apply and fully develop the Cubist principle of poly-perspective. If you read her article date should be fine. Also analytic-cubism is places around that date. Dimensions arent stated neither expo number. Will correct date after passed voting. --Petar Milošević (talk) 14:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Cropped at top? Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enramed. --Petar Milošević (talk) 18:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – This isn't in public domain in it's home country (and it's not on Commons). Although the FP criteria doesn't say so specifically, I think all of our FPs are either public domain or have a free license for use in any (I meant home) country. Bammesk (talk) 17:22, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bammesk That's not true. There are many FPs which are only in the public domain in the United States (like photos of buildings and painting). Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for the correction. I assumed wrong. Bammesk (talk) 00:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Agree, i saw many photos which are not or can not be on Commons and were FP on en.Wiki. --Petar Milošević (talk) 18:46, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Petar Milošević (talk) 09:00, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:09, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:09, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jacek Malczewski

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2021 at 10:28:08 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution.
Articles in which this image appears: Jacek Malczewski
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Jacek Malczewski

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 10:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Can we be sure this shows the entire painting? --Janke | Talk 12:16, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the framed version --Andrei (talk) 20:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, Support, then! --Janke | Talk 11:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per TheFreeWorld --Andrei (talk) 20:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 14:45, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —kallerna 09:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ×Elvorix^talk 06:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Self-portrait in White Dress - Jacek Malczewski.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andasol Solar Power Station

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2021 at 07:49:10 (UTC)

Reason: high EV, good quality for aerial photo
Articles in which this image appears: Andasol Solar Power Station, Concentrated solar power
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
Creator: kallerna

Support as nominator —kallerna 07:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 14:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ×Elvorix^talk 06:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 16:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Andasol 5.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added image to Places/Others instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oystercatcher feeding with juvenile

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2021 at 18:39:21 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. Not in infobox, but high EV. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Eurasian oystercatcher
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:39, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 14:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunately messy background, adult too covered by chick, lowers EV. --Janke | Talk 13:55, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ×Elvorix^talk 06:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ringlet butterfly

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2021 at 18:48:42 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Ringlet
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:48, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 14:48, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —kallerna 09:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. --Janke | Talk 13:55, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:51, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ×Elvorix^talk 06:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 16:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ringlet (Aphantopus hyperantus) underside.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:47, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]