Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Mycena leaiana

Support as nominator --Sasata (talk) 05:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose undiffused single flash (looks like camera mounted) has left harsh shadows. Mfield (talk) 05:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Mfield. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 17:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to the shadows. It just doesn't look very natural. J Milburn (talk) 18:14, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm going to go against the flow of opinion here. There is obviously artificial lighting here, but I think it makes it a bit more dramatic, and it has definite Enc.Terri G (talk) 19:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Enc. yes, and eye-catching, but it looks over sharp and, agreeing with J Milburn, the lighting isn't natural enough. I imagine a better, more natural, picture could be taken of this subject. Well, someday! Maedin\^talk 20:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I think this is a great photo of an extremely interesting subject. I think it meets quality criteria and while the lighting is definitely artificial, I notice very few shadows and I think the lighting is perfect for the situation. Agree strongly with Terri G. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 23:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 01:41, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]