Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The Sleeping Gypsy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2021 at 21:28:21 (UTC)

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 21:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Enough detail at 69 pixels per inch. EXIF says ISO 5000 but it's not noisy! Bammesk (talk) 02:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Famous painting. Does DPI really matter? I've always thought FPC has a pixel size requirement, not DPI on the original. (Larger is always better, of course, but this is already 3.4K x 5.4K...) --Janke | Talk 09:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It shouldn't matter as long as the scan captures the details of a painting or drawing. For example a line drawn by pencil can easily be 0.5mm wide (0.020 inch) or less, so a resolution of 50 pixels per inch would barely capture such a line or detail. Bammesk (talk) 02:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This is a big canvas, so even more resolution would be good for getting fine detail on the brushwork, but this is good enough for FP for now and we can replace if we ever get a really high-res scan. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ - Eliko007 (talk) 09:36, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Struck vote of sock puppet. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 15:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Gnosis (talk) 03:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]