Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 June 11
Appearance
June 11
[edit]- AtilimGunesBaydin (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic. Flag image is taken from an unreferenced Flags of the World page purporting to depict flags of the "Sixteen Great Turkish Empires", the vast majority of which are fanciful and uncited. No scholarly reference is given for this flag. --Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 17:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as a matter of course. This is completely unhistorical original research, driven primarily by nationalist considerations (Asena). --Ghirla-трёп- 08:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I created this reproduction upon a request by one of the contributors to the Göktürks article, believing it to add value to the article because this is the alleged flag of the Göktürk state (as I noted in the image description). The Flags of the World web site was the most reputable online source for current and historical flags I could come up with and I did not have enough time to check printed sources. I did not even consider referring to many amateur/nationalistic online sources presenting this flag as an historical fact without doubt. I certainly don't believe Ghirlandajo can declare anything "completely unhistorical". Also please don't be so quick to judge Wikipedians' intentions, it's just rude, to say the least. I agree that the lack of the mention of an ultimate scholarly reference can be considered enough reason for this image's deletion. Atilim Gunes Baydin 11:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - Where could this image be used that would be encyclopedic? – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- I believe its use in the Göktürks article, where it had been in use before the nomination for deletion, would be encyclopedic, with proper notice that this design is alleged (if a reliable source to that effect can be cited) or confirmed (again by some reliable reference). It could also add value to the Asena article, covering a Göktürk folk legend about wolves, as the flag is associated with the same people and its design involves a wolve. Other possible uses could be in some existing categories/lists of historical flags. Atilim Gunes Baydin 23:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- If you put it back in the article in this manner, and if it aids in the reader's understanding of the article, then I think the image should be kept. – Quadell (talk) (random) 23:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- The flag does not enhance the article because it is the invention of a user on Flags of the World. The fact that Atilim copied it from that website does not make it encyclopedic, or notable. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 03:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Flags of the World is NOT by itself a reliable source unless the images on there are cited to other sources- there are many invented and fraudulent entries. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 03:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Gumilev and some other writers mention that the Gokturks had an image of golden wolf featured on their war standards. They don't cite their sources, and there is no way of knowing what that image looked like. Any modern attempts to represent that flag qualifies as original research and wild-eyed speculation. --Ghirla-трёп- 08:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- If you put it back in the article in this manner, and if it aids in the reader's understanding of the article, then I think the image should be kept. – Quadell (talk) (random) 23:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Ghirla Alex Bakharev 14:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. As Ghirla pointed out, there are sources about the flag (e.g. Gumilev ... etc.). However, i wonder whether there exists sources claiming the contrary (this flag is not the Gokturk's flag). Unless it's falsified, i'm in favor of keeping the image. E104421 11:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- PaddyBriggs (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Poor quality. →Ollie (talk • contribs) 00:06, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep image is in use, low quality is not a reason to delete an in use image. -N 06:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Have replaced the image in that article with one that better demonstrates the topic. →Ollie (talk • contribs) 00:04, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Orphan image, currently not used in an article --ROASTYTOAST 19:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- This image was originally licensed as GFDL-self but the uploader later changed it to indicate it could "not be reproduced, redistributed or modified" and "to be used on this Wikipedia profile page only". These limitations make the file non-free and as such not available to be used on a user page. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete while ordinarily I'd say a GFDL release is irrevocable, for an unencyclopedic personal photo perhaps we should overlook that... -N 06:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, perhaps under a different license? I'm interested in keeping the photo on my page since it is indeed me. I will modify the license, or I can modify the photo slightly or get a new photo up there. Please advise. Piewalker 13:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- You've already released the photo under the GFDL which is irrevocable. If you wish to continue using this image on Wikipedia you'll have to change the license back. You are always free to upload another photo under a free license as well. -N 16:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Reuploaded under free license as directed. Please review. I modified the photo slightly by cleaning up the black speck on the bottom border (it has bothered me for years). Also, I found it was interesting that the photo and my user page is indexed on the 12th page of a Google image search for "green eyes". Piewalker 14:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- You've already released the photo under the GFDL which is irrevocable. If you wish to continue using this image on Wikipedia you'll have to change the license back. You are always free to upload another photo under a free license as well. -N 16:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Routhanatorz71 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No substantial attribution and encyclopedic value. --Brand спойт 12:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Comment No longer orphaned, as it is obviously intended for use in the article about the group it depicts. I placed it into the article. The article may not even be keepable, however. —Gaff ταλκ 19:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- However, it came straight from: http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~chordial/images/groupwelcome.jpg so it may be copyvio? But then again, that is just the university site, not a commercial site. —Gaff ταλκ 19:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Copyvio -- universities own copyrights too. howcheng {chat} 22:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic, low quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Redjennphd (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 01:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- The Iconoclast (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 01:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 01:46, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 01:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 01:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, article deleted in AFD Coredesat 01:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Vampireeat (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned, unlikely for use in an encyclopdia —Gaff ταλκ 01:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Giorditalo (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 01:54, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image of White-necked Jacobin, not clear that this will be needed for this article. —Gaff ταλκ 02:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- In use, not deleted. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Kellieyraines (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 02:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ashishbharadwaj (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 02:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- JuliaOelfke (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned, unlikely for use in an encyclopdia —Gaff ταλκ 02:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Victor van Poppelen (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned, unlikely for use in an encyclopdia —Gaff ταλκ 02:46, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ladysylvanas (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 02:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Crepe Cafe Marketing (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 02:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 03:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 03:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 03:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Mohdnasir24 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 03:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Aquatraveller (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 03:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Aquatraveller (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 03:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Aquatraveller (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use, also "beaner" is akin to "nigger" —Gaff ταλκ 03:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Aquatraveller (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 03:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- obsolete. See Image:Care bears.jpg —Gaff ταλκ 03:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Mikecali19 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- low quality, compared to numerous other images of same subject —Gaff ταλκ 03:16, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Daniel 123 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- low quality, compared to numerous other images of same subject —Gaff ταλκ 03:18, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient information for me to determine encyclopedic value Iamunknown 03:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient information to determine encyclopedic value Iamunknown 03:28, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient information to determine encyclopedic value Iamunknown 03:28, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient information to determine encyclopedic value Iamunknown 03:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient information to determine encyclopedic value Iamunknown 03:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient information to determine encyclopedic value Iamunknown 03:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient information to determine encyclopedic value Iamunknown 03:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient information to determine encyclopedic value Iamunknown 03:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ashleyarttart (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is a photograph of a work of art. I'm not sure that taking a photo of a work, then calling it an original piece is a valid use of GFDL. —Gaff ταλκ 04:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, blatant copyright violation. See [1]. This isn't a copy of that image, but it was probably copied from the same source that one was. (Blow up the image and notice the texture. This is a poor quality scan). -N 06:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- If this image can be kept, somehow, it was used on the Yoshitomo Nara article. Please replace it (simply undo my last edit) if the image can be saved. I'm a fan of the artist, but the image seems to apparently be copyvio. —Gaff ταλκ 18:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- If you can find the source of the image it might be possible to make a fair use claim. -N 19:28, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Meh, it's an orphaned image anyway. howcheng {chat} 22:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, I misunderstood. According to Commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama#Japan, photos of permanently installed artistic works like statues are allowed only for noncommercial use. This could be kept under a fair use claim, but the Nara article would need to give some critical commentary on the statue in order for us to keep it. howcheng {chat} 01:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Obi-Ben-Kenobi (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Prop image supposedly represents (based on file name and page it used to appear on) doesn't actually appear in picture. —EEMeltonIV 05:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficent information to determine encyclopedic value Iamunknown 07:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, album cover for a band with no article.- Punkmorten 08:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Crispy park (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan- Punkmorten 08:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Crispy park (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, unencyclopedic, Wikipedia is not Photobucket.- Punkmorten 08:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Crispy park (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, unencyclopedic, Wikipedia is not Photobucket.- Punkmorten 08:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Crispy park (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, unencyclopedic, Wikipedia is not Photobucket.- Punkmorten 08:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Crispy park (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, unencyclopedic, Wikipedia is not Photobucket.- Punkmorten 08:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Crispy park (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, unencyclopedic, Wikipedia is not Photobucket.- Punkmorten 08:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Crispy park (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, unencyclopedic, Wikipedia is not Photobucket.- Punkmorten 08:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- WMF Resolution Policy Violation (Resolution -> 3 -> living notable individuals), it has been superseded by Image:NVidiaMobileMediaPress JensenHuang.jpg. BrockF5 11:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep for a little while longer, until it's certain no fair-use rationale is coming from the uploader. The second picture Brock refers to is horrible quality while the first is very good.--Mike18xx 05:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Obsoleted by Image:Sneslogo.png. — Anomie 13:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Firebal535 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic, inactive uploader, orphaned The Sunshine Man 15:06, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hellololmo (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic, inactive uploader The Sunshine Man 15:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Brainiac125 125 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic, could be an attack The Sunshine Man 15:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Markisthebest (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Wikipedia is not a myspace, unencyclopedic, inactive uploader The Sunshine Man 15:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, no article about person, inactive uploader The Sunshine Man 15:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, seems unencyclopedic, inactive uploader The Sunshine Man 15:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Photo was used on page Gorgi which has been deleted due to unencyclopidic content and copyright violation. The picture is not used anywhere on wikipedia and should be seedily deleted — Greatestrowerever 15:16, 11 June 2007 (UTC).
- Redundant to Image:0216071730.jpg, WP is not a Myspace unencyclopedic The Sunshine Man 15:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Lord awork (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic, inactive uploader, orphaned The Sunshine Man 15:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ginnyathome (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned, spoof image of the TV advert The Sunshine Man 15:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- JDMichaels (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned, inactive uploader The Sunshine Man 15:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- JDMichaels (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned, inactive uploader The Sunshine Man 15:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- JDMichaels (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned, inactive uploader The Sunshine Man 15:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned, no article about the subject The Sunshine Man 15:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- R uk0712chelsea (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned, Wikipedia isn't a myspace The Sunshine Man 15:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- NZGrindcore (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned, inactive uploader The Sunshine Man 15:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, semi-active uploader The Sunshine Man 15:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- AskaZz-hunee01 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Wikipedia is not a Myspace, orphaned, unencyclopedic The Sunshine Man 15:28, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic, Wikipedia isn't a Myspace The Sunshine Man 15:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic, inactive uploader The Sunshine Man 15:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic, orphaned The Sunshine Man 15:52, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic The Sunshine Man 15:54, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep it and put in an article. ~ Wikihermit (HermesBot) 03:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan. — RJASE1 Talk 16:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Mike123454325 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Suspected copyright violation.Uploader claims to be the creator of the image but extended Metadata details show the copyright holder to be Getty Images — No Guru 17:51, 11 June 2007 (UTC).
- Delete was suspicious just because it looked "too good" but I had no evidence... Metadata is convincing though. --W.marsh 18:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I'm interested to know how you check meta data. —Gaff ταλκ 18:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind, I figured it out. I took this image down from the Clements article, replacing the older free image. —Gaff ταλκ 18:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- The image was deleted by Nae'blis, but the Commons copy (which has been tagged for a speedy) is showing through. On a side note, please don't upload images from SPAs with questionable licensing to Commons. --BigDT 05:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 18:35, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use —Gaff ταλκ 18:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use, low quality relative to numerous others on same topic —Gaff ταλκ 18:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, absent uploader, unlikely for encyclopdic use, low quality relative to numerous others on same topic —Gaff ταλκ 18:40, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Non-commercial use only image, uploaded before May 19, 2005. Image is currently used in Tai Mo Shan — Peacent 19:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation - The image might be used in violation of copyright. This photo appears on the Mugglenet webpages - it's the photograph of the inside of a person's house and personal desktop. The uploader claims permission from the website, but I don't think so. Also, Orphan - The image is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. 67.149.103.119 22:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- says "Please remove this image, it is too large" written by the uploader, it really has no use otherwise --trey 22:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned --trey 22:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- copyvio, see the URL in the left corner. Please block the guy finally: aggressive vandalism and copyvio, several blocks before — Polarlys 23:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- copyvio, see the URL in the left corner — Polarlys 23:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- no source, uploader doesn’t care about copyright, google image search — Polarlys 23:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)