Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 December 6

< December 5	December 7 >

December 6[edit]

File:Nissan Heisman Voting CJ Suh Ingram.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wizardman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nissan Heisman Voting CJ Suh Ingram.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Robapalooza (notify | contribs).

Graph where information is completely unsourced, and hasn't been updated in at least a week. I could see an argument to keep it if someone was keeping it up to date, but nobody is. fuzzy510 (talk) 04:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Technically, a source was quoted. If you look at the top of the graphic, there is a URL typed that leads to ESPN's website, and the person who created the graphic included the URL in his description of the graphic. However, I went to this page, and it was a contest held by ESPN that has ended, and there is nothing to show now, which is probably why the graphic hasn't been updated. I agree that the graphic should be deleted, but because the information is no longer available and wasn't official data to begin with... it was the results of the contest, voted on by fans, not the people who actually vote on the Heisman Trophy. BucsWeb (talk) 12:47, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's true that there is a source, but the updated vote totals are hardly verifiable, and when one of the three individuals in the graph isn't even a finalist for the Heisman Trophy, it just makes the whole thing seem pointless (to me, at least). --fuzzy510 (talk) 04:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STREET PARTAY!!! 082.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wizardman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:STREET PARTAY!!! 082.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dodgy uk (notify | contribs).

Worthless image. Makes me wish there was a speedy for "obvious junk". JaGa^talk 06:07, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unencyclopedic. Not a web host. Orphaned. No useful description. Uploader's only contribution. How do I want to delete thee? Let me count the ways... --Hammersoft (talk) 16:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DJ Screw 2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wizardman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DJ Screw 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fr3shjp (notify | contribs).

There is already a better image in DJ Screw article. Uploader has incorrectly named himself as the author of this promotional image. Also, the date of the image says 2008 even though the DJ died in 2000. Karppinen (talk) 10:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evacuate+The+Dancefloor+(American+cover).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wizardman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evacuate+The+Dancefloor+(American+cover).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gersende (notify | contribs).

Fails NFCC #8 and also is virtually identical to the other cover being used. Its also grossly oversized. Suede67 (talk) 11:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Properfrontwall.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - Peripitus (Talk) 11:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Properfrontwall.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KrystleB (notify | contribs).

The following images are part of the same group of images all with the same problems.

Delete Non-free derivative image of a US sculpture for which no freedom of panorama exists but has a non-free 3D art licence as well as being claimed a PD by the uploader. The image is missing a fair use rationale and is used in a gallery which fails WP:NFCC#9 and WP:NFCC#3a for non-free images and because there is no commentary about the image so will clearly fail WP:NFCC#8. Image is high resolution so will fails WP:NFCC#6. This is part of a large cleanup of nearly 200 sculpture images uploaded as one part of the project Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia Saves Public Art in which most uploaders have not complied with copyright and non-free requirements. (For cleanup worksheet see more listings on User:Ww2censor/FOP statues) ww2censor (talk) 15:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per ww2censor & noting that both Ww2censor & I have been offering help and guidance to Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia Saves Public Art and the project is now clear on WP:FOP issues as they relate to 3-D art in the US. Nancy ^talk 12:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further - the gallery has been removed so most of the above are unused non-free and therefore eligible for relative speedy.Nancy ^talk 12:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all no freedom of panorama. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:05, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 2463.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG 2463.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NiallQuinn (notify | contribs).

Useless orphaned image. JaGa^talk 17:11, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Places I have been.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Places I have been.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by P.Marlow (notify | contribs).

Abandoned user page image. No encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 17:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep First of all, no I have not abandoned my user page, but thanks for assuming that. Secondly, whilst it probably doesn't have much – if any at all – encyclopedia value, most user pages are littered with similarly unencylopedic content. I would ask you not to delete, but I truly doubt that will have any effect. The fact is that is that wikipedia has become such a hostile place, becoming more and more pretentious as to what content should or shouldn't be included, that its no surprise I haven't edited anything on wikipedia for a while, let alone my user page. Delete it, frankly I just don't care any more. Then again this paragraph being over 100 words, you probably didn't read it, nor did you care.--P.Marlow (talk) 19:38, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize that this nomination is for File:Places I have been.png, which is orphaned (and therefore called an "Abandoned user page image"), and not File:Places I have been 2.png, which is on your user page, right? --JaGa^talk 00:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete How does this contribute anything even tangential to the project? We're not a web host. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heikki washington.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heikki washington.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wempain (notify | contribs).

Abandoned user page image. JaGa^talk 17:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mats-Carnmarker.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ThePBrane (talk) 21:43, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.