Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 March 25

< March 24	March 26 >

March 25

Va-TableImage.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Va-TableImage.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Schneelocke (notify | contribs).

Incorrect chemical symbol (should be V, not Va). Corrected SVG image available at Commons Papa November (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Glenn_Morrison_Live_in_Shanghai_China.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glenn_Morrison_Live_in_Shanghai_China.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fnclub74 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, image is of a non-notable DJ who's bio was regularly posted to Glenn Morrison in place of the notable rugby player. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It served no purpose other than self promotion. Now it doesn't even serve that. --DanielRigal (talk) 12:19, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Travis_Barker_Drawing_by_Ritesh_Rai_vodkaholic_Ray_Emo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Travis_Barker_Drawing_by_Ritesh_Rai_vodkaholic_Ray_Emo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ritesh_41 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal drawing Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pierfrancesco Favino.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pierfrancesco Favino.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rohmerin (notify | contribs).

Rationale indicates the subject is deceased, but our article doesn't seem to think so. I'd say this is a replaceable image. Brought here for wider scrutiny in case it's our article, not the image, which is in error. (The image is also missing a licensing tag, but that's probably easy enough to figure out later) (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Stefano Accorsi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stefano Accorsi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rohmerin (notify | contribs).

Same story as my previous entry above - looks like a boilerplate rationale gone overboard, but I could once again be wrong. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Jasmine Trinca.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jasmine Trinca.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rohmerin (notify | contribs).

Same as above, rinse and repeat. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Britney-Spears.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Britney-Spears.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mr Vinx (notify | contribs).

Unlikely self created work, the correct source without covering all information is http://www.britneyspears.com/2009/03/fan-photos-from-canada.php, two reasons: 1. No metadata and only web size image, 2. going to a concert and uploading only one small but good quality image is not common. Please provide a version with correct metadata and full resolution. 82.83.43.85 (talk) 04:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

0414608b.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:0414608b.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Critical Chris (notify | contribs).

Non-free image used when free text is sufficient. There isn't discussion of this photo or the need for an exact appearance. Jay32183 (talk) 06:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have to take dispute with this photo being listed for deletion. This historic photo, which cannot be re-created, is not being used for profit but rather, only being used for educational purposes in terms of a public policy matter substantially within the public interest of the people of Oakland and the Bay Area. Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the substance of the article because the lakeside (Lake Merritt) greenfield parcel the photo depicts, and that parcel's historical significance from a land use perspective, are the object of discussion of a land development proposal mentioned in one of the article's subsections. I'll be adding a bit of context to the article text to complement existing material, but do you mean to assert that "free" text paints the same picture as the photo? I beg to differ. CriticalChris 07:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What you've just said has absolutely nothing to do with WP:NFCC. Why is this image in this article. The rationale you've given is that this is the only photo, but you haven't actually explained the need for a photo. We don't need to see this image to understand the article, which means it fails WP:NFCC#1 and #8. Jay32183 (talk) 01:48, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP Sure the photo is needed. It helps to illustrate a public policy question over the historic land use of the gardens parcel which is currently on the chopping block before the Oakland Planning Commission. It helps depict the age and contrasts the historic condition of the gardens with their current state. CriticalChris 09:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, image used for decoration only, failing WP:NFCC#8. Stifle (talk) 10:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

0415928b-1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:0415928b-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Critical Chris (notify | contribs).

Non-free image used when free text is sufficient. There isn't discussion of this photo or the need for an exact appearance. Jay32183 (talk) 06:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have to take dispute with this photo being listed for deletion. This historic photo, which cannot be re-created, is not being used for profit but rather, only being used for educational purposes in terms of a public policy matter substantially within the public interest of the people of Oakland and the Bay Area. Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the substance of the article because the lakeside (Lake Merritt) greenfield parcel the photo depicts, and that parcel's historical significance from a land use perspective, are the object of discussion of a land development proposal mentioned in one of the article's subsections. I'll be adding a bit of context to the article text to complement existing material, but do you mean to assert that "free" text paints the same picture as the photo? I beg to differ. CriticalChris 07:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What you've just said has absolutely nothing to do with WP:NFCC. Why is this image in this article. The rationale you've given is that this is the only photo, but you haven't actually explained the need for a photo. We don't need to see this image to understand the article, which means it fails WP:NFCC#1 and #8. Jay32183 (talk) 01:48, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP Sure the photo is needed. It helps to illustrate a public policy question over the historic land use of the gardens parcel which is currently on the chopping block before the Oakland Planning Commission. It helps depict the age and contrasts the historic condition of the gardens with their current state. CriticalChris 09:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, image replaceable by text and in any case not essential to readers' understanding, failing WP:NFCC#1 and #8. Stifle (talk) 10:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SUGGESTION I think that the easiest--if not the only--way to resolve this matter, is to have a separate section created in the article for extra historic photos with captions. Is that doable? While the current layout of historic photos is good overall (particularly the key system one), perhaps a compromise for such can help make the page even more effective for those who are concerned for the garden--according to Chris' text. Although if the old garden pics may not be a reflection of the text about it as a whole (saying that in a subjunctive manner), I feel that they are still interesting enough to include somewhere within. dlikuski 2:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- That would still violate the non-free content criteria. The historic photo claim can only be made when the photo itself is the subject of discussion. Sometimes the only way to solve an image issue is to delete the image. WP:NFCC is itself a compromise. In general, avoid non-free content. Jay32183 (talk) 06:41, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Khan February 2004 confession.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khan February 2004 confession.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fastfission (notify | contribs).

Irrelevant non-free screnshot shows a man saying things on tv, used just to make the point that he said things on tv. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Damiens.rf 17:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Chocobos mysterious dungeon ost cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept per discussion Skier Dude (talk) 04:51, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chocobos mysterious dungeon ost cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PresN (notify | contribs).

Image usage fails WP:NFC guideline. Use of "[a]n album cover as part of a discography" is explicitly disallowed. Since this is the only use of the image, it should be deleted. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:55, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - despite the use of 'discography' in the article's title, please actually look at the article- it's not a table/list, it's all of the albums related to the game series discussed in a single article just as fully as they would be if they were in their own articles. And since no one has any objections to using the album cover in an article discussing one album, why should there be a problem using that same cover in an article that discusses several albums? --Pres N 21:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this is the only non-free image used in the article so the usual WP:NFCC#3a argument doesn't apply. Stifle (talk) 10:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Texas International.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Texas International.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andman8 (notify | contribs).

Image description page notes that the copyright holder is unknown. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Zum schwarzen Ferkel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zum schwarzen Ferkel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andman8 (notify | contribs).

Image description page says of the copyright holder: "... whose identity is wholly unclear." We can't host images if we don't even know who holds the copyright. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

John Cary Red Morgan.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Cary Red Morgan.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andman8 (notify | contribs).

Image description page says of the copyright holder: "... whose identity is wholly unclear." We can't host images if we don't even know who holds the copyright. Additionally, this file would seem to be replaceable by a work of the US government, I would think. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NFCC#10a. Stifle (talk) 10:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Surrogate_recording.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Surrogate_recording.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Geizo94 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, poor composition of image, is of a marginally notable (IMO) band, Surrogate (band), which article already has a suitable photo. Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Bruno_Maddox_in_1996.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruno_Maddox_in_1996.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Radosh (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, image text (2006) is in conflict with the name (1996) regarding the date of the image, duplicate to a commons named File:Bruno Maddox at The Week in 2006.jpg Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Gday_usa_1_26_08.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gday_usa_1_26_08.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sookietex (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, low quality due to zoomed in closeness to subject, Julian McMahon -- unless your talking about the length of his eyelashes. Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Hawk_Nelson_2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hawk_Nelson_2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xxtakeme (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, sole contribution of user, poor quality image as two of the four band members have their back to the camera, and while there is a band by this name Hawk Nelson which has some images, I am not sure they are the same as shown in this image. Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Abreu_performing_Vivaldi_at_New_England_Conservatory_Feb_3_2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abreu_performing_Vivaldi_at_New_England_Conservatory_Feb_3_2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pacerking (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, sole contribution of user, lower quality, unable to determine who subject is based on Abreu or the surname listing article. Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Shahid_Triguna.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shahid_Triguna.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mstriguna (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, no text provided identifying subject, was added by uploader to the Shahid Kapoor article and then immediatly removed by the user, comparing this image to the google image search, I am not sure it is the same person. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ShahRukhKhan.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ShahRukhKhan.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WiseWoman (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, replaced on the subject article by File:Shah rukh khan wiki1.jpg Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

BenjaminJacksonBurnley.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BenjaminJacksonBurnley.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ashleyw2005 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, recently absent uploader, low quality due to size, replaced on article with File:Ben Burnley in Greensboro, NC 2008.jpg Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Malinowskidrawing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malinowskidrawing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Somepercent (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, sole contribution of user, possibily could be of Bronisław Malinowski but that is not clear, also given it is a drawing of a photograph I am unsure if there are copyright issues Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wentworth_Miller_sketch.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wentworth_Miller_sketch.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Anusharao88 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality fan drawing, replaced on article by File:Wentworth Miller 2008.jpg Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Mk1mx-8.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mk1mx-8.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Guyfromboracay (notify | contribs).

Bigger version of File:Mk1mx-8 small.jpg. So same reasons as with that one, which was discussed a while back. --DavidDCM (talk) 23:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.