Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 March 30
March 30
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Red carpet jeannie ortega 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Smpictures (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, image is watermarked, questionable encyclopedic use. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 01:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, questionable use, non-image file. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 01:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ruff4.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HarleyHyde2386 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, likely used on deleted article per uploader's talk page Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:India_schoolgirls.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 0reteki (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CSUN_at_Long_Beach_2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mahu1982 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal group shot Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CSUN_at_Las_Vegas_2007.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mahu1982 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal group shot Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:19, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Uncle_Wiggily_Winning_Moves_0909.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TimmyTruck (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, unlikely to be GFDL-self as it is the artwork for a board game, there is insufficent information provided to "timestamp" the artwork and there are sufficent other images in the article, Uncle Wiggily (board game) Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, replaced in article by File:4-Phenylthiosemicarbazide.svg from commons Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Robin_Chapel_logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tpacw (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, replaced in article by File:Robin Chapel banner.png Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:30, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:VerbX_logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chrbennett (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, questionable GFDL-self license as a logo, replaced in article on corporation by a newly designed logo File:New Verb Logo.jpg Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Unfinished_Confessions.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hiryuvahn (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, image likely used on multi-deleted article on the band per the uploaders talk page Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Thaddis_"Kuk"_Harrell.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kidfrost08 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, replaced in article with File:Kuk sm.jpg Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The_jacob_family_051.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bjaco18 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The_new_lot_120.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bjaco18 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absetn uploader, low quality fuzzy image Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Niceguyrecords_logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Finishlast (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, likely used on deleted article per users talk page Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Thescrubs_liveincleveland.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Finishlast (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, likely used on a deleted article on the band Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, while it is a nice photo without any information provided it is not possible to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:48, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic, conflicting licensing information provided Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic group photo, unlikely to be GFDL-self as it is a school photograph Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Bjweeks (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Marian rivera.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dico Calingal (notify | contribs).
- Full Flickr copyright, no evidence of permission. MBisanz talk 03:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mfield (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mel Tiangco.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dico Calingal (notify | contribs).
- Faulty source, no proof of GFDL. MBisanz talk 03:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unless there is some OTRS relating to this that is not listed on the page, there is no proof that the uploader took the photo, owns the license, or otherwise has permission to use it freely. Ariel♥Gold 00:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This image does not add much significant value to the understanding of the reader. See WP:NFCC in particular criterion 8, and also this is more non-free images than needed criterion 3a. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 04:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. PhilKnight (talk) 23:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Optimized image 2c936118.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 718 Bot (notify | contribs).
- It's a conflict of interest. (The station is WPBT, and the uploader's name is Jgwpbt.)
If we keep this, it has to be renamed, and it has to be transparent-ized. Raymie Humbert (local radar | current conditions) 04:38, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This is nearly {{PD-ineligible}}. Stifle (talk) 08:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This image does not add much significant value to the understanding of the reader. See WP:NFCC in particular criterion 8, and also this is more non-free images than needed criterion 3a. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 04:58, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:John Brown in Ghost Hunt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Octane3k (notify | contribs).
- This image does not add much significant value to the understanding of the reader. See WP:NFCC in particular criterion 8, and also this is more non-free images than needed criterion 3a. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 06:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hideto matsumoto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JinecouO.N.E (notify | contribs).
- A free-licensed image earlier from HK Wikipedian available - File:Hidetll.jpg Brock contact... 09:00, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Mentifisto (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned file. User does not use picture anymore. Polemon (talk) 13:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Claire Fisher in The Plan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Smee (notify | contribs).
- does not offer any critical commentary or discussion of the episode in question. It's just a shot of a character looking at another character off-screen. It could be any moment from any appearance of the character and there's nothing that ties this particular image to a moment of any significance in the episode or even the series. Otto4711 (talk) 15:21, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:UltimeGridaSoundtrack.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Helltopay27 (notify | contribs).
- Seeing how I am the uploader of this file and I'm the one nominating it for deletion, I think it's fairly safe to say that it doesn't belong. By better understanding Wikipedia's image policy, I've determined that this image isn't suitable for the article (i.e. it exists only as illustration and does not provide substantial encyclopedic content), and hence is an orphaned image that should be deleted Helltopay27 (talk) 17:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CannibalHolocaustfire.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Helltopay27 (notify | contribs).
- Seeing how I am the uploader of this file and I'm the one nominating it for deletion, I think it's fairly safe to say that it doesn't belong. By better understanding Wikipedia's image policy, I've determined that this image isn't suitable for the article (i.e. it exists only as illustration and does not provide substantial encyclopedic content), and hence is an orphaned image that should be deleted Helltopay27 (talk) 17:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pine street.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pinestreetboys (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. Found at Orphaned images in Category:Self-published work. JaGatalk 18:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:09, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cropmethodbanner8ls.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Numerator (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, personal artwork, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Aar block 2.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mr Jetking (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value, probably copyvio. JaGatalk 18:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DaveGorman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mr Jetking (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Xeroxcommonwealth.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mr Jetking (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value, possible copyvio. JaGatalk 18:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dr. Seabolt with family & friends.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Happycupcake (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, low quality, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SNC62201 copy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Krysalist (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value, questionable copyright status. JaGatalk 18:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, low quality, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Dreadstar (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value (not to mention disgusting). JaGatalk 18:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RPICentralCampus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Seaslipper (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, little encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I've been watching this image. Its not notable or useful. Danski14(talk) 22:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tufts wordmark noseal nouni.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Skeejay (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, little encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kladrubak praha 2005.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cocopelli (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, low quality, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:30, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, low quality, little encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 18:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Copyvio from press agency Reuters that is not necessary for the understanding of the article about Fidel Castro. Fails WP:NFCC itens #1, #2, #8 Damiens.rf 18:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Two of the images are non-free (and nominated for deletion as well). Therefore, it's not possible to release this under the GFDL. Stifle (talk) 16:53, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Complicated licensing; uploader appears to have made a collage of some free and some non-free images we already have. I don't think such a collage is desirable, and the copyright holder(s) are not defined. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All ethnic group pages have a college of famous people of their ethnic group. PRODUCER (talk) 00:50, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Are there others which are collages combining free and non-free images? If so, those should probably go too.... The problem is that for this image, we cannot define a copyright holder - you can't be the copyright holder because you used non-free images. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ive gone ahead and added the appropriate licenses. PRODUCER (talk) 15:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with PRODUCER. Appropriate licenses are there, no need for deletion. Historičar (talk) 11:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - As you can see from the image's history page, multiple license tags on the images in this collage were changed by the uploader after this discussion began. The component images need review to make sure they do meet these new tags. (ESkog)(Talk) 12:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Safvet beg Bašagić.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PRODUCER (notify | contribs).
- Source is listed as "unknown", which does not meet NFCC 10 that we state the copyright holder. Additionally, this guy is long since dead; surely we can get a photo which is out of copyright (in fact, if we knew the source of this one, it may be). (ESkog)(Talk) 20:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The same explanation as for Bosniaks picture, meaning disagreed with deletion. Historičar (talk) 11:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That doesn't make sense, since my reason for nomination was totally different here. Do you know what the source of this image is? If not, we can't keep it. (ESkog)(Talk) 12:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "This does not apply to historical images, where sometimes only secondary sources are known, as the ultimate source of some historical images may never be known with certainty."PRODUCER (talk) 23:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No, NFCC 10a has no such exception. We need to know who is the creator of the image, and, if different, who holds the copyright, or we can't keep it. (ESkog)(Talk) 11:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "This does not apply to historical images, where sometimes only secondary sources are known, as the ultimate source of some historical images may never be known with certainty."PRODUCER (talk) 23:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SANU Memorandum.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PRODUCER (notify | contribs).
- As a copyrighted photograph of text, it is minimally replaceable by a less-infringing restatement of the part of the text we are actually commenting on. As it's just a poorly rendered image of text in another language, I don't see what the image's value is to the article. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Replaceable by free alternative: The newspaper was founded in 1965 in Cuba, so its first editions are already in the public domain (considering Cuban copyright laws). Damiens.rf 21:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Alan_ford_logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mjhalliburton (notify | contribs).
- I unintentionally uploaded the file twice, so there is now an identical duplicate. I had originally followed incorrect procedures for uploading a company logo and then subsequently uploaded the same file under a new name using the correct procedure. Therefore, this file may be removed; please retain the duplicate file named "Alan_Ford_Architects_logo.jpg," however. Thanks! Mjhalliburton (talk) 22:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.