Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 October 13

< October 12	October 14 >

October 13

File:Y1p6AoOyNnWwXiK GZwBO3FHBFdKLW3Swe8hneoUdBccZ9nUHItRYN940kqgYMx1JiP1PGQ9T-St7kAwn3wYphUCQ.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not PD-China，took in 1989.No permission by it's original author.Zhxy 519 (talk) 02:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Raja Chavan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OR, very low quality Skier Dude (talk 04:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ucb logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC) This is not the University of California, Berkeley seal, there is no use for it. The correct seal can be directly seen here from UC Berkeley: [1]. It has also already been replaced by the correct seal on all Cal-related pages. --Andyhi18 (talk) 07:33, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rob Wells, September 2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User has previously uploaded two files [2] (26 August 2008) [3] on the same subject that they neglected to provide license information for. Third upload has PD claim, which should be questioned, given their track record. Fixer23 (talk) 10:07, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Impala logo1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OB Cuestaluis (talk) 11:40, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:9782953386707 frontcover small.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Religious proportions.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

Orphaned images left over from the deletion of Machiavelli and The Mayflower via a deletion discussion. (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Machiavelli and The Mayflower). Soundvisions1 (talk) 12:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:99James.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo credited to "steve" and its source listed as "personal". User was blocked in 2007 as a "vandal only account" Soundvisions1 (talk) 13:10, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused personal photo, user blocked. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 10:23, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:9O 2007.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Image of words from a user who only appeared to have created an account and uploaded this. The entire summarys is: 90 massive headache snowman cara boiz boggey master undarali bodna frshi n aysha Soundvisions1 (talk) 13:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC) Soundvisions1 (talk) 13:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused file, no need for some random words image in Wikipedia. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 10:25, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Breakaway.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of what appears to be a school band. Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused personal photo. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 10:25, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, useless, and out of scope at Commons. Nyttend (talk) 23:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BenjaminErstad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cggc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:KillRonan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

Unused and orphaned from the deleted userspace article User:Qotsa37/Kill Ronan!. Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:35, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused file from some deleted page. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 10:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A GloBAL.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image. On February 15, 2007 the uploader created account, uploaded this and created a nonsense user talk page: User talk:Ibink 182. Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused file with no real meaning in Wikipedia. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 10:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Picture of Julie.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image, low rez. Appears to be a personal photo - no summary but the files name indicates it is "a picture of Julie" Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:57, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused personal photo. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 10:28, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Granville Township Putnam.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hennepin Township Putnam.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Magnolia Township Putnam.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Senachwine Township Putnam.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs)

These files were superceded by new, more detailed maps at Commons (see Category:Maps of Putnam County, Illinois) and are, as a result, currently unused. I proposed here and at Commons (here and here) that they (and ~1,100 others in Category:Illinois maps) be moved to Commons, but there does not appear to be any interest in getting them—they are, after all, lower-quality versions of content which is already on Commons.

This is a trial nomination to determine whether there is consensus on Wikipedia to delete these files; if a consensus exists, then I will nominate the other ~1,100 files in a follow-up nomination (I can fairly quickly generate a list using AWB) and a bot could tag them all. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 16:48, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Illinois has been notified. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 16:54, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - seems like uncontroversial cleanup. If anyone can think of a current or future use for these, then I would reconsider my position. –xeno^talk 17:01, 13 October 2010 (UTC) Disclosure: Came here from the BOTREQ thread[reply]
Delete per discussion at WP:BOTR — like the other ~1,100 images, these have been superseded by higher-quality content, so they're simply not useful anymore, and thus they're both worthy of deletion here and also out of scope at Commons. Nyttend (talk) 23:53, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A shoreline dream COASTAL vertical HIRES.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused orphan from the deletion of A shoreline dream in July 2007 and again, via a deletion discussion, (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A shoreline dream) in September 2007. Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:14, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A11.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image from 2006 Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:31, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Personal, unused file. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 09:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A1997.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal snapshot. Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:35, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused personal file. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 09:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A22.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal photo modified in a photo program. Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused personal file. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 09:21, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:C. oregona.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Absent uploader, Orphaned and according to a comment left on Talk:Tiger beetle it's not even the right species. I'd move it except that the species name is watermarked on the image. howcheng {chat} 18:57, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ABC News 24 Chile Mine Rescue.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This TV screenshot is replaceable by a free equivalent (and it even says "replaceable: Yes" in the description). There are tons of CC-BY photos of this rescue at [4]. The image therefore violates WP:FUC #1. Sandstein 19:40, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not so sure that this is easily replaceable. See the Commons AN here, in the section "Conflicted licensing of several images". The conclusion there was that the Chilean govt had never intended to release the images under a "free as in freedom" license. And they seem to have been changed on Flickr to reflect this. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:16, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mario Sepulveda Surfacing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This TV screenshot is replaceable by a free equivalent. There are tons of CC-BY photos of this rescue at [5]. The image therefore violates WP:FUC #1. Sandstein 19:40, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not so sure that this is easily replaceable. See the Commons AN here, in the section "Conflicted licensing of several images". The conclusion there was that the Chilean govt had never intended to release the images under a "free as in freedom" license. And they seem to have been changed on Flickr to reflect this. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:16, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ABC News 24 BBC News Simulcast Chile Mine Rescue.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This TV screenshot is replaceable by a free equivalent (and it even says "replaceable: Yes" in the description). There are tons of CC-BY photos of this rescue at [6]. The image therefore violates WP:FUC #1. Sandstein 19:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not so sure that this is easily replaceable. See the Commons AN here, in the section "Conflicted licensing of several images". The conclusion there was that the Chilean govt had never intended to release the images under a "free as in freedom" license. And they seem to have been changed on Flickr to reflect this. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A255251cff4e4eb3818c.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of "Reid Burger in class" giving the finger. It appears the uploader did nothing else but create an account to upload this. A random guess might be the uploader wanted to embarrass "Reid Burger" by publicly posting it. Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC) Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mmnamesm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sxsss.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Note233.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Note-final.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Note-nahayi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Note1388-8-30.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Malekan88.10.21.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Kave.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Liste malekan 1389.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

All unused images of a "list". Have no idea what their use was/is but I suspect it has something to do with a computer game, or a work in progress city named "MAD". (See some of the users other uploads such as File:5plan.jpg - a "plan of morvaridegharb"; File:D in 2007.jpg - "interrior design of unit d" and File:A2aaa.jpg - "view of mad"). Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:14, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A350xwb nose 2009.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Seems to have been replaced by File:A350xwb nose 2009B.png Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:21, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A8OSEROPKPGC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image. File:Ashley, summer.jpg was a duplicate "with different licensing information". Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused personal file. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 09:21, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AAA024A.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image. "This Is Selina Ortiz" Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:30, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused personal file. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 09:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AB ON A TRACK.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image from a user blocked for spam. Image page is also slightly spammy with the images description. Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:56, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused personal image uploaded by a blocked user, no need to keep. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 09:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.