Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 October 27

< October 26	October 28 >

October 27[edit]

Superpower maps[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete all. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:39, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All of these maps are either inaccurate or exadurated or both. For example: Japan was occupied in a combined fasion like Germany and Austria making Japan not a colony or trust territory of the US at all. The Commonwealth Realms were not in the British Empire, they were independent nations who merely shared the same monarch as that of the United Kingdom, (most of the dominions had become Commonwealth Realms in 1931). None of these maps are in use and have been replaced by File:Superpower map 1945.png. Vadac (talk) 01:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nocturne eurovision1995.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#8 - not critical to understanding the article. Used as decorative image in infobox. Mosmof (talk) 03:04, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The name of the article is "Nocturne (Secret Garden song)" and the article says "performed in Norwegian by Secret Garden representing Norway". If one wanted to simply use an image of Secret Garden there is a free image available: File:Secret Garden1.jpg. This image is of one of the "two guest musicians" who came out at the Eurovision contest and sang with the band. I would say this image is borderline if used in the article itself showing "Norwegian vocalist Gunnhild Tvinnereim" at the contest, however as it is used currently this image does nothing to illustrate the actual name of the article: "Nocturne (Secret Garden song)" Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Matt King.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#8 - unclear how this image helps readers understand the subject. Mosmof (talk) 03:09, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and WP:NFCC#1 - easily replaceable with free media in City vs Country Origin and superfluous in Matt King as the article already contains other pictures of the player. QU ^TalkQu 21:17, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ejecutivospue.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#8 - image not necessary to convey encyclopedic information Mosmof (talk) 03:13, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:COPA.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image is too low quality to be of encyclopedic use Mosmof (talk) 03:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Memo cup.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#8 - no contextual significance. Unremarkable image of a team celebrating a championship. Mosmof (talk) 03:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eddie Wolstenholme 20020316.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#8 - Image itself is not informative enough to provide any encyclopedic information. Text does an adequate job of telling us what the image doesn't. Mosmof (talk) 03:16, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Battle of Bramall Lane 20020316.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#8 - Image not necessary to understand that a player was sent off. Mosmof (talk) 03:16, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stn6sc.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stnpart2screen.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Stnpart3againsc.JPG (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Stnalt2.JPG (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Stn3sc.JPG (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Stn4sc.JPG (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
File:Stn5sc.JPG (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unencyclopedic, only use was on User:Sharrieff C./Sandbox which has been deleted via MfD. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 04:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, no encyclopedic usefulness. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all: Unused personal images. All orphaned. Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:29, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Unused, unuseful personal images. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 14:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ranitidine.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, low resolution, better alternatives in Commons:Category:Ranitidine. Leyo 13:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pearsons-Bun-Maple-Wrapper-Small.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails several NFCC criteria:
- Purpose of "help[ing] the reader identify the product or service" is already accomplished by the company logo (NFCC#3A). No reasonable person would require an image of the wrapper in the already existing context provided by prose and the logo.
- That notwithstanding, an image of the candy itself (without wrapper) could fulfill recognition purposes freely (thus images fails NFCC#1).
- The article has no discussion of the wrapper design, its significance to the company, or even of the product itself (!!!); there is thus no significant contribution to the reader's understanding of Pearson's Candy Company (thus fails NFCC#8).
- Now moot, but is also not low resolution (NFCC#3B), and is not appropriately licensed (this is not a logo - NFCC#10B) Эlcobbola _talk 16:05, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Concur with elcobbola. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:K2sreddy1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and orphaned image of user K2sreddy, and as such also fall under Unencyclopedic. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 19:45, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anurognathus29.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very unclear screenshot. Hard to tell where the creature starts and the foreground / background stops. PhilKnight (talk) 19:49, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree, and also add on that there's nothing significant about the appearance discussed in the article that is depicted in the image. Rather pointless image. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:16, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GiantSpider29.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, this is a non-free image of a spider. In all honesty, it doesn't add much. PhilKnight (talk) 20:04, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing notable about the appearance in this image referenced in the article, supported by secondary sources. Rather pointless to have this image, and it's so dark that details are indiscernible. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:15, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prim pteranodon.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could be replaced with a free image of a pteranodon, for example File:Pteranodon hharder.jpg. PhilKnight (talk) 20:07, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see that the image is necessary for the article it is in at all, but if an image of the creature is necessary then the free equivalent provides information to substantiate any discussion about the appearance of this creature, since the depiction in this photo is rather poor, and does not offer any reason to believe it's appearance is in any way different than it's real (now extinct) counterpart. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it's a replaceable non-free image. jonkerz ♠ 23:16, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scutosaurus29.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image depicting a non fictional extinct creature. Replaceable with a free alternative, for example, File:Scutosaurus BW.jpg. PhilKnight (talk) 20:15, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as others, and no out-of-universe notability apparent for visual appearance of the creature necessitating inclusion. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it's a replaceable non-free image. jonkerz ♠ 23:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rgandhellhighwaterlogo copy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Uploader upped several versions of this. File:Rgandhellhighwater2logojpeg.jpg is the only one being used. The others have been deleted. Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unused image with hard-coded captions. jonkerz ♠ 23:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ANGELA HILL 1-09B.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and orphaned form the deletion of Angela Hill. Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:31, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ANIMATOR.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Created account on September 12, 2007, upped this on September 16, 2007. No other contributions. Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:34, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blairexorcism2.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image. Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zoefried.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low rez image. Looks like a head shot for an actress. Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:38, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PollyHolliday Fried.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PJ SOLESFRIED.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:JoBobFriedRiggs.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Blood Background.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Blairexorcism.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Necropolisvideologo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:ANIeyeballBlood02C.gif (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Tentrevive.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:ANIdripRed.gif (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:ANIseveredHand03C.gif (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Tent Revival Blue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Tent Revival two.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:ContactFlag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Foxy,Foxy what's it gonna be.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs)

In doing more looking I see the uploader came here to promote their own projects. These all seem to be orphaned images from deleted articles on some of them, and possibly other articles created by the same user. Kentucky Fried Horror Show, Strangeland 2: Desciple, Biblical horror films Soundvisions1 (talk) 23:39, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.