Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 February 13

< February 12	February 14 >

February 13[edit]

File:Lomza Beer.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image lacking a rationale. I would have tagged it as speedy, but such tags have already been repeatedly removed. Kelly ^hi! 02:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NaotboxS.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. All concerns appear to have been rectified. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:24, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image lacking a rationale. I would have tagged it as speedy, but such tags have already been repeatedly removed. Kelly ^hi! 02:17, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Should have been deleted back in January when it was tagged. The is an obvious derivative work, the image may be "free" but the underlying imagery is not. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:23, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is a shoebox. This obviously is covered by Template:Non-free product cover. Marokwitz (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WarkaBeer.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image lacking a rationale. I would have tagged it as speedy, but such tags have already been repeatedly removed. Kelly ^hi! 02:19, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is covered by Template:Non-free product cover. Fair use rationale can be easily added instead of deleting. Marokwitz (talk) 09:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YoplaitS.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Please see my note below about the importance of having a license to use the photo itself (which we have). --B (talk) 05:52, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image lacking a rationale. I would have tagged it as speedy, but such tags have already been repeatedly removed. Kelly ^hi! 02:20, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is covered by Template:Non-free product cover. Fair use rationale can be easily added instead of deleting. Marokwitz (talk) 09:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NFCC#8 because the significance of the Israeli product's experience is not discussed, and also fails WP:NFCC#1 because the product's appearance is not so significantly different from other Yoplait branding that it couldn't be described textually. It looks like your typical Yoplait branding, the only difference being that it's in Hebrew rather than English or something. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:34, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It is a product shot, the brad logo is already used in the info box - showing the actual product doesn't add anything in the context of the article text about the Israel product. Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This photo illustrates the section about Yoplait world franchises, and specifically the Israeli franchise which is discussed in the article. Therefore this image is not redundant. Marokwitz (talk) 08:39, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If it were a photo of the drinkable yogurt container that was discussed in the text, your argument might have some more merit, but the regular container being illustrated is nothing special. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:41, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it shows the logo in context, and it's the version with six petals as described in the article. The copyright tag seems to be wrong - in addition to the logo and picture on the carton, the other parts of the image are also eligible for copyright - or is the history page sufficient for this? Peter E. James (talk) 06:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Marokwitz. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 11:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- We have already challenged Markowitz's keep !vote. Would you like to address the challenge to that rationale? SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As it stands, the licensing is insufficient. The photographer has rights to the photo independent of the fact that it is a derivative work of the yogurt container. For us to keep this photo, the uploader, assuming that he is the photographer, would need to make some statement releasing his rights. If you make a derivative work of a copyrighted work, it may be an unauthorized derivative work (assuming you didn't have a fair use defense) and the copyright holder could sue you and stop you from distributing it, but that wouldn't give them rights to themselves distribute the work - because you have still made a protected work. So we need a viral permission to use that derivative work. --B (talk) 05:46, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- And I see that the user originally uploaded it with a Creative Commons license. I'm noting that on the description page and closing as keep per the above discussion.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jitender.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 03:23, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tower-wireless.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, obsoleted by File:Wireless tower.svg. Kelly ^hi! 04:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ctnash.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, obsoleted by higher quality images such as File:Parthenon.at.Nashville.Tenenssee.01.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 04:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Borg-chip.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 04:10, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Slide rule example2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, obsoleted by File:Slide rule example2.svg. Kelly ^hi! 04:31, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Songs sign.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user image. Kelly ^hi! 04:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dwad.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, if used should be a wikitable instead of an image anyway. Kelly ^hi! 04:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SandF.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 04:54, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Speck.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 04:54, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GM50 (1).JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, no authorship info on depicted 3D artwork. Kelly ^hi! 05:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This pic was voted for deletion a few years ago by user:spotteddogsdotorg and was resolved as do not delete, and that is not a 3d image of the GM50 as I shot it outside on the porch rail TVSRR (talk) 03:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rytu vilnius.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned PNG map. Kelly ^hi! 05:13, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:American Serbs x16.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A montage of sixteen images, five of which are non-free. You can't use non-free images without the result being non-free, and I can't imagine any way in which this image could pass the fair-use criteria. Nyttend (talk) 12:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:10th Earl's death.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Author requested deletion of this file due to another like image uploaded and accepted into Wiki Commons. Inomyabcs (talk) 12:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Girls at maze entrance.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 14:29, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Starfield.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator. You may, by the way, feel free to just close it if you are withdrawing your own nomination. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:35, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader does not own the rights to the image. "I am not the originator of this photo. I do not hold the copyright. This photo depicts the Canadian Christian music group Starfield. Photo credits go to Lee Steffen." GrapedApe (talk) 16:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Withdrawn. The description page was vandalized.--GrapedApe (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I am the uploader and I own the rights to the image. The statement quoted above by GrapedApe is a vandalized version of my initial summary which states that "I am the originator of this photo. I hold the copyright. I release it to the public domain. This photo depicts the Canadian Christian music group Starfield." Neelix (talk) 17:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.