Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 August 26
August 26
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. --BDD (talk) 21:12, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CompanyLogo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Colejohnson66 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Image is a black and white version of File:L&T-logo.svg which is not being used. Unnecessary to have both. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Also delete image:CompanyLogo.jpg and image:Ltnitsxrlogo.png for the same reasoning. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:20, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bangerz (Deluxe Version).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheRaulRomero (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Redundant, see File:Bangerz.jpg and WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 18:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. --BDD (talk) 21:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Epic wikipedia.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zalgo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphan, unencyclopedic - Screenshot of a speedily deleted vandalism/hoax page, not used anywhere Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Uploader has been indeffed with no talk page access due to trolling, and this image is of no encyclopedic value. Johnuniq (talk) 23:25, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. --BDD (talk) 21:15, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kanye West - Black Skinhead.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NCFan12311 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
"sample" is not a rationale. I tagged as no-rationale but was reverted. (ESkog)(Talk) 23:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Terrible rationale. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:02, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I typically use {{subst:dfu}} instead of {{subst:nfurd}} if a file has something which is claimed to be a fair use rationale but which is missing essential components of a FUR. That gives me the possibility to specify what's wrong. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.