Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 December 27

< December 26	December 28 >

December 27

File:Paul McCartney and Barry Gibb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image seems to fail WP:NFCC#8 as there is no contextual significance to the image. The only discussion about the episode that is discussed is about the sole fact that the two men embraced during the closing. Therefore the image also fails WP:NFCC#1 as the image is simply replaced by text. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:18, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does every image on Wikipedia have a contextual significance? Many photos are just to show something or someone. In this case, this is showing two icons of the music business, together. According to the Guinness Book of World Records, McCartney and Gibb are the two most successful pop songwriters in history. Lou72JG (talk) 13:04, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Every image does not, but every non-free image does per WP:NFCC#8. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paridhi Shrama in a still from Jodha Akbar(TV Series).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as a free image could be made of Paridhi Shrama for the article about her. This non-free image is of the actress portraying a character, and a more encyclopedic photo would be one of her as she normally is (free image). -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:22, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OutlineInColorpromo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by DMacks (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image fails WP:NFCC#1. The current use as identification in the infobox could easily be replaced by a free image taken of the band. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:29, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manila in aftermath of being declared "open city" (1942).gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by MER-C (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by File:Manila declared open city.jpg (technically ineligible for F8 so using FFD) Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious Delete minor technical difference or not, there is no need for both images. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skylar Jean (talk • contribs) 13:05, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DamienEstreich.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Insufficient/unclear licensing. De728631 (talk) 22:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Although image has an OTRS tag, the image is not been released under any license by the uploader and therefore should be deleted as a non free file that is replaceable. (See Wikipedia:OTRS noticeboard#ticket 2013022010009729 for information about the OTRS ticket.) Also the image is only used on an WP:AFC page which has not been edited in over 6 months and will soon be deleted as WP:CSD#G13 and there will not be a use for this low resolution image. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:22, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Indigenous rights organizations.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A collage of non-free logos fails to meet NFCC under almost any circumstances. HiDrNick! 16:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-- use of non-free logosSkylar Jean (talk) 13:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seven-three-one XF.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image fails NFCC, is not used to support critical text or to explain visually what words cannot; purpose seems entirely decorative. GRAPPLE X 20:14, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Colony TXF.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk)

Image fails NFCC, is not used to support critical text or to explain visually what words cannot; purpose seems entirely decorative. GRAPPLE X 20:14, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Per this original debate. I agree it isn't the best image, but it's far from the worst. The Undead Never Die (talk) 06:06, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
comment: [1] would adding something quoting from here solve the issue? it directly discusses "the bodies of the male clones are feminized" "in one scene, several identical men in white lab coats..." I have added something that tries to be a solid FAIR justification, but on reading the article, there is already very good content in place that would work as FAIR justification for instead of using this shot, instead getting a screen shot of the Bounty Hunter.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:54, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cumberbatchtheatre(cropped).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Secret (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Under a false claim to ownership Lady Lotus • talk 21:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cumberbatchtheatre.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Secret (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File under a false claim to ownership Lady Lotus • talk 21:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cumberbatchsherlock2013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Secret (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File under a false claim to ownership Lady Lotus • talk 21:34, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Benedict Cumberbatch at TIFF.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete as F11--Ymblanter (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File under a false claim to ownership and a copy of another actual file on commons Lady Lotus • talk 21:35, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sherlockcumberbatch2013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Secret (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File under a false claim to ownership Lady Lotus • talk 21:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cumberbatchstagedoornationaltheatre.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Secret (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

file under a false claim of ownership Lady Lotus • talk 21:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cumberbatchtimecover.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Secret (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

image not necessary to use in article Lady Lotus • talk 21:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-- It supplements the "In the Media" section of the page. It is not being used as a primary identifier of the page. It has proper licensing. I don't see any problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skylar Jean (talk • contribs) 13:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment --To be honest, I wasn't sure about the free use of this file, the user who uploaded this has previously uploaded images of Cumberbatch under a false license and for fan base purposes so I wasn't sure if the file was a legitmate use for his article page. But thank you for your input :) Lady Lotus • talk 14:27, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Blatant failure of WP:NFCC#8. You don't need a picture of a magazine to know that he has appeared in the media. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (this also serves as a comment to stefan2's argument) of course he is a celebrity so it is obvious that he has media coverage. but the image is about the extent of cumberbatch's media influence. it is a time cover and only a handful of actors are given the privilege of being in the cover of the magazine. most importantly, it is not just about the cover at all. it is about the headline. "playing genius: a string of breakout roles-- from sherlock to khan to assange is turning benedict cumberbatch into the thing he most fears, a star." it encapsulates his [1] ascension from being a cult actor to being an international star (it is discussed in the section itself) [2] indicated his breakout roles in his breakout year in 2013 [3] indicated the media's perception of him as being the one who always plays geniuses ("playing genius") [4] his reluctance to the celebrity machine ("thing he most fears, a star") that he has talked about in other interviews it just doesn't supplement the section, it summarizes the media attention centered to him in that cover alone. it tells the reader so much more than the text itself. his time cover also caused a kerfuffle when it was released that time magazine itself wrote about the fervent reaction of the internet about it. see here http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/10/17/this-is-how-the-internet-reacted-to-benedict-cumberbatch-on-the-cover-of-time/Siliconspray (talk) 04:13, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cumberbatchstagedoor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File under a false claim to ownership Lady Lotus • talk 21:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michael with Jane Alexander.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image claims to be released under CC-by-SA 1.0 license and that permission was sent to OTRS. Image was uploaded in October, still no evidence of permission -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MHutchins with bat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image claims to be released under CC-by-SA 1.0 license and that permission was sent to OTRS. Image was uploaded in October, still no evidence of permission -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:With koala.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image claims to be released under CC-by-SA 1.0 license and that permission was sent to OTRS. Image was uploaded in October, still no evidence of permission -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mhutchins with JC.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image claims to be released under CC-by-SA 1.0 license and that permission was sent to OTRS. Image was uploaded in October, still no evidence of permission -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Annajamesphoto.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User is known for sockpuppetry and uploading images under a false claim to ownership for fan base purposes. Anna James was a girlfriend of Cumberbatch, the main article the user edits, i can near guarantee that this is under a false cla to ownership Lady Lotus • talk 21:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jschaul w elephant.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image claims to be released under CC-by-SA 1.0 license and that permission was sent to OTRS. Image was uploaded in October, still no evidence of permission -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jordan collage.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image claims to be released under CC-by-SA 1.0 license and that permission was sent to OTRS. Image was uploaded in October, still no evidence of permission -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jordancschaul headshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image claims to be released under CC-by-SA 1.0 license and that permission was sent to OTRS. Image was uploaded in early November, still no evidence of permission and the image is not currently in use -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mike w animal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image claims to be released under CC-by-SA 1.0 license and that permission was sent to OTRS. Image was uploaded in October, still no evidence of permission -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mieshellecat 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image claims to be released under CC-by-SA 1.0 license and that permission was sent to OTRS. Image was uploaded in October, still no evidence of permission -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jordan Schaul & Jack Hanna.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image claims to be released under CC-by-SA 1.0 license and that permission was sent to OTRS. Image was uploaded in October, still no evidence of permission -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jordan Schaul.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image claims to be released under CC-by-SA 1.0 license and that permission was sent to OTRS. Image was uploaded in October, still no evidence of permission -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

These are better suited for WP:PUF. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jschaulblackbrownbears.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn due to new information. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 11:46, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Although image is listed to be CC-by-sa-1.0, the OTRS email (see Wikipedia:OTRS_noticeboard#ticket_2013101510014781 does release the image under any rights. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've spoken with both the subject and the photographer who have clarified the copyright position and there is no an explicit granting of a CC3 licence. NtheP (talk) 10:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per the process of OTRS permissions verifications, which this particular file has failed. I'm not sure what @Nthep: is referring to at the end of his comment, but we cannot take his word that the files are free, even if he spoke with the bears. ;-) We need something from the owner of the file releasing it under a free license, like a standard OTRS ticket does, or the file is not suitable for the project. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry perhaps I should have made it clearer, the conversation was on OTRS on the ticket that already exists. NtheP (talk) 20:11, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Nthep: I'm confused. User:Someguy1221 said on the OTRS noticeboard that the images were not released under any license. Is that not the case? If not, does the ticket mention anything about the other photos of that uploader (all are of the same person). -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since this discussion began I emailed the subject and have received fuller confirmation from him and the photographer about copyright ownership and release. I did ask about the other images of him but he hasn't come back on those as yet. NtheP (talk) 21:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.