Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 January 19

< January 18	January 20 >

January 19[edit]

File:R001-002.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not described, never added to an article, no idea where this is Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete as unusable. Mangoe (talk) 14:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:R0011225.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (never added to an article, not really clear who these people are) Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:58, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Why, it's Team South Burnett, of course! I'd recognize them anywhere. Seriously, this appears to be part of a promotional edit to Tasting Australia which was never completed and which lay around for three years before finally getting removed. The promotional website is gone, and this image ought to be gone too. Mangoe (talk) 14:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:R1-R9 Truck Description Panel.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photo of copyrighted sign Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Regardless of copyright I cannot see what use we would every have for a photograph of a display label in a museum. Mangoe (talk) 14:51, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Move to Commons - No evidence of copyvio, and the sign serves a legitimate purpose related to both the R1 through R9 Subway cars and the New York Transit Museum. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 17:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- UPDATE - Just moved this to the commons earlier today. There's still no evidence of any copyright violation. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 04:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Then see Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:R1-R9 Truck Description Panel.JPG. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:23, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Gee, are you going to ban images of stop signs too? -------User:DanTD (talk) 12:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rage!!.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Charles smith.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RageCloud.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ragged Sail Design Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Might have been intended for user page use but as it appears to be a commercial logo we would not have permitted that use. Mangoe (talk) 14:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rags.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 10:37, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unverifiable source Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete? This was obviously supposed to be included in Rags (dog) and was, for a time, while the article was being constructed. Due to formatting errors I don't think it could ever actually be seen. As a picture of the dog the current photo is clearly superior; possibly it could be used to illustrate the sort of postwar usage of the mutt as a patriotic display. If the picture were old enough then it would be PD and it could be moved to commons, but unfortunately I cannot find an original source for the image. Mangoe (talk) 15:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Consider Move to Commons per Mangoe's information, and place under the category "Military working dogs of the United States," along with the two other images in the article that are already tagged. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 17:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The problem is that, from what I've seen elsewhere online, this is from Rags' post-WWI tour around the US, and Rags lived past 1923 so it could potentially have been taken after that (without knowing mroe). Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:42, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ragunan zoo map.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photo of copyrighted sign, no freedom of panorama in indonesia[1] Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:26, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rah-lee Llama - Fishercat's Secondary Mascot and Spiritaul Leader.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, character is likely copyrighted Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:27, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Goes with New Hampshire Fisher Cats, and I'm not sure why the article doesn't mention the Rah-lee Llama (possibly because the mascot wasn't popular enough to continue). I don't know that we need to go past "a llama in a baseball uniform" though. Mangoe (talk) 15:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rahmanjohnson.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, professional headshot with no verification of permission Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:29, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rahul kumar singh.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Appears to be picture of user's friend, never used that I can tell. Mangoe (talk) 15:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rahul-gandhi.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

appears to be a professional photo (Rahul Gandhi), no verification of permission Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete made obsolete by File:Rahulgandhi.jpg, which is PD-US. Mangoe (talk) 15:41, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rahulaiwa9.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete ostensible self-pic of banned user, will never be used. Mangoe (talk) 15:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:File name.ext[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "File_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put the name of the uploader just after "Uploader=", and your reason for deletion just after "Reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:FFD or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Montazeri1352 (talk) 08:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Saakashvili-Hitler montage.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of a hacked website, used to document a political cyberattack. Can easily be replaced with a verbal description; nothing in the article hinges on any visual detail that couldn't be covered in this way. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

keep In theory any image can be described but in this case the actual historical appearance is better than a description. Mangoe (talk) 15:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete actually a textual description would be better, because I don't know who a lot of those people are. Something along the lines of "A collages of photos of ____, ____, Hitler, etc." would be more useful to readers. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:46, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:"Venice Under Sea" scene from Les Contes d'Hoffman (2011).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Very low quality, plenty of other images on only page it is used on :Jay8g ^{Hi!- I am... -What I do...} _{WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC} 18:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.