Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 November 13

< November 12	November 14 >

November 13[edit]

File:Jjjjjjjjjjjj.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userspace image, potential for encylopedia use minimal. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:11, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and delete it, I'm impartial towards this move. alexanderao (talk) 01:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Planta despacho.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I came across this while doing copy-to-Commons work. It's clear this is an architectural plan of some kind, but I have no idea what of, it's not well categorized, and it's completely unused. I'd ask the author, but he hasn't been active in 6 years. —Darkwind (talk) 04:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vidysagar.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Encountered while doing move-to-commons work. No indication of who this is - file is orphaned and not meaningfully categorized, and contributor has not edited in 5 years. —Darkwind (talk) 05:47, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oil Portrait of Mary Dowse.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that this satisfies WP:NFCC#8 in Dowse Art Museum. Stefan2 (talk) 11:08, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

it's the only known image of the deceased person this institution is named after, seems like it does to me. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not about the person, though. Non-free images of the person fail WP:NFCC#8 in the article about the institution. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Richard Berry Earth Angel LP cover scan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NFC#UUI §8 and §9. Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFC#UUI#8 and #9, album covers are not to be used to illustrate how the artist looks/looked like. Aspects (talk) 17:47, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Halloween Costume Cyclops.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cyclops Halloween costume.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rayban Avaitors.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Halmstad Fotograf Adam Mørk 2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by John Reaves (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, sourced to website, author name not same as uploader name Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:18, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. These are good quality pictures of a group of Danish architects. There are used in one article, not orphane and should be moved to commons if license is all right.. Hafspajen (talk) 03:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SHL Sort Diamant hoved billed Foto Jørgen True Low.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by John Reaves (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, sourced to random website, uploader name not same as author name Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:19, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. These are good quality pictures of a group of Danish architects. There are used in one article, not orphane and should be moved to commons if license is all right. Jørgen True Low in Danish would be with Jørgen True permission . Hafspajen (talk) 03:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SHL Sort Diamant Fotograf Jørgen True low.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by John Reaves (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sourced to random website with no indication of CC licensing, uploader name not same as author name Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. These are good quality pictures of a group of Danish architects. They should be moved to commons if license is all right. Jørgen True Low i Danish would be with Jørgen True permission . Hafspajen (talk) 03:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SHL Nykredit Fotograf Kuhn og True1.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by John Reaves (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sourced to random website with no indication of CC licensing, uploader name not same as author name Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. These are good quality pictures of a group of Danish architects. They should be moved to commons if license is all right. Jørgen True Low i Danish would be with Jørgen True permission . Hafspajen (talk) 03:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SHL ARoS Foto Adam Mørk.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by John Reaves (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sourced to random website with no indication of CC licensing, uploader name not same as author name Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:21, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. These are good quality pictures of a group of Danish architects. They should be moved to commons if license is all right. Hafspajen (talk) 03:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nuuk Adam Mørk2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by John Reaves (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sourced to random website with no indication of CC licensing, uploader name not same as author name Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:21, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. These are good quality pictures of a group of Danish architects. They should be moved to commons if license is all right. Hafspajen (talk) 03:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Halmstad Fotograf Adam Mørk 1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by John Reaves (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sourced to random website with no indication of CC licensing, uploader name not same as author name Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:21, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. These are good quality pictures of a group of Danish architects. They should be moved to commons if license is all right. Hafspajen (talk) 03:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SHL ARoS Adam Mørk.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by John Reaves (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sourced to random website with no indication of CC licensing, uploader name not same as author name Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:21, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. These are good quality pictures of a group of Danish architects. They should be moved to commons if license is all right. Hafspajen (talk) 03:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hardnightout.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kaava7.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:28, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kaavajr4.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:28, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Things i saw 003.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, very poor quality (wouldn't be able to identify the species) Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:44, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.